The maps below show the centre os a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for it's development. v.1

Young people are indeed a group of people in the society, which should be protected. A vast majority doesn't have enough experience to protect themselves fully, so how to ensure safety of young generations remains a highly controversial issue. Nevertheless, I think that such a strong law, which prohibit students to go away late, doesn't solve the problem. Personally, I believe that such an approach won't decrease crime rate and it would cause other serious problems. To begin with, going late at night doesn't necessarily put you in a dangerous position. The statement that darkness means danger can be discussed and argued. According to an article which I recently read, statistically crimes don't occur during the night more during the day. Furthermore, some places are utterly free every time, they are highlighted constantly and no risk would emerge there. It's a highly controversial statement that night activity should be controlled so much. Secondly, a strong law like this definitely makes a young person less free and doubly possible benefits cost such a high price. I could imagine myself being in such a situation and I would be quite depressed due to this illogical and strict approach. Even in my family any prohibition would somehow destroy my relationship with parents. Speaking of the government, the risk to raise generations who would like anarchy emerges. To sum up, a law shouldn't make so strong restrictions on a person's liberty. In conclusion, strong methods of solving problems don't prove themselves as reliable ones, especially in situations when their usage is not justified. Overall, our society should tend to find compromises where possible.