Opinions are split among many when it comes to whether boys and girls get benefits from being taught together or not. Many people prefer single-gender schools, while others argue that mixed schools bring more benefits. However, I incline to view that co-educational schools are the way forward.
Advocates of single-sex schools believe that boys and girls have different attitudes towards learning and teachers can employ particular techniques designed specially to match the gender. For instance, studies reveal that boys learn better when classroom temperature is cool, while girls perform better in warm classrooms. So, the temperature in a single-gender classroom could be set to suit the different needs of male or female students. In addition, when students are not distracted by their opposite sex, they often find it easier to focus on academics. This means that students participate actively in the classes where everybody is the same sex.
On the other hand, the proponents of mixed schools argue that co-ed schools prepare their students better for the future career. That is to say that when boys and girls are taught in the classroom, they can develop teamwork skill with the opposite sex. This is an opportunity that completely lacks in single-gender classrooms. This opportunity is of paramount importance because it mirrors the real world. Moreover, mixed schools provide the chance to understand and communicate with the opposite sex. Boys and girls have different perspectives and in a mixed school, they manage to learn from each other.
In conclusion, the prime objective of education is to prepare students for the future life. In co-educational schools, girls and boys learn from each other and can see the world in a different light from different perspectives. Mixed schools, thus, inculcate certain values and principles that are useful for their future.
Opinions
are split
among
many
when it
comes
to whether
boys
and
girls
get
benefits from
being taught
together or not.
Many
people
prefer single-gender
schools
, while others argue that
mixed
schools
bring more benefits.
However
, I incline to view that co-educational
schools
are the way forward.
Advocates of single-sex
schools
believe that
boys
and
girls
have
different
attitudes towards learning and teachers can employ particular techniques designed
specially
to match the gender.
For instance
, studies reveal that
boys
learn better when classroom temperature is cool, while
girls
perform better in warm classrooms.
So
, the temperature in a single-gender classroom could
be set
to suit the
different
needs of male or female
students
.
In addition
, when
students
are not distracted by their opposite sex, they
often
find it easier to focus on academics. This means that
students
participate
actively
in the classes where everybody is the same sex.
On the other hand
, the proponents of
mixed
schools
argue that co-ed
schools
prepare their
students
better for the future career.
That is
to say that when
boys
and
girls
are taught
in the classroom, they can develop teamwork
skill
with the opposite sex. This is an opportunity that completely lacks in single-gender classrooms. This opportunity is of paramount importance
because
it mirrors the real world.
Moreover
,
mixed
schools
provide the chance to understand and communicate with the opposite sex.
Boys
and
girls
have
different
perspectives and in a
mixed
school
, they manage to learn from each other.
In conclusion
, the prime objective of education is to prepare
students
for the future life. In co-educational
schools
,
girls
and
boys
learn from each other and can
see
the world in a
different
light from
different
perspectives.
Mixed
schools
,
thus
, inculcate certain values and principles that are useful for their future.