Nowadays there is a controversial debate on whether studying history has more merits or other science-based lessons. This is widely considered by several individuals that acquiring knowledge about the past is essential for youngsters, while others oppose with them. I think science and technology topics have further importance than history. Both views will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, a group of people claims that it is indispensable for students to have History courses in their curriculum. According to their belief, reading about disasters such as the Holocaust or World Wars in the former times can inspire young generations to learn from their mistakes and avoid repeating similar catastrophes in the future. This also might contribute to better insight into the fundamental base of their culture as well as how their traditions have evolved. So, it gives them a sense of roots of belonging. For example, by comprehending the history of Iran, pupils could demonstrate their respect for the memories of those who suffered to preserve our country.
On the other hand, this is stated that history is a topic that is rarely used in people’s lives so it would be better to focus on other practical skills like biology or information technology. These courses play significant roles in ameliorating the standard of living in various countries by addressing numerous troubles. As an illustration, the cutting-edge methods in biomedicine dramatically enhance life expectancy in most western nations.
Moreover, in my opinion, teaching valuable fields of study in particular state-of-the-art technologies probably are responsible for unraveling today's hardships. On the contrary, memorizing the lists of battles or the name of great humans and also events that had happened in chronological order not only is impractical but also is waste of time and boring. For example, by utilizing advanced techniques and large-scale farming the dilemma of hungriness could be eradicated globally.
In conclusion, although teaching past events have several benefits, I contend learning relevant lessons to science and technology can be more profitable. Therefore, these high-priority subjects must be put in the school syllabus.
Nowadays there is a controversial debate on whether studying
history
has more merits or
other
science-based lessons. This is
widely
considered by several individuals that acquiring knowledge about the past is essential for youngsters, while others oppose with them. I
think
science and
technology
topics have
further
importance than
history
. Both views will
be discussed
in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, a group of
people
claims that it is indispensable for students to have
History
courses in their curriculum. According to their belief, reading about disasters such as the Holocaust or World Wars in the former times can inspire young generations to learn from their mistakes and avoid repeating similar catastrophes in the future. This
also
might contribute to better insight into the fundamental base of their culture
as well
as how their traditions have evolved.
So
, it gives them a sense of roots of belonging.
For example
, by comprehending the
history
of Iran, pupils could demonstrate their respect for the memories of those who suffered to preserve our country.
On the
other
hand, this
is stated
that
history
is a topic
that is
rarely
used
in
people
’s
lives
so
it would be better to focus on
other
practical
skills
like biology or information
technology
. These courses play significant roles in ameliorating the standard of living in various countries by addressing numerous troubles. As an illustration, the cutting-edge methods in biomedicine
dramatically
enhance life expectancy in most western nations.
Moreover
, in my opinion, teaching valuable fields of study
in particular
state-of-the-art
technologies
probably
are responsible for unraveling
today
's hardships.
On the contrary
, memorizing the lists of battles or the name of great humans and
also
events
that had happened in chronological order not
only
is impractical
but
also
is waste of time and boring.
For example
, by utilizing advanced techniques and large-scale farming the dilemma of hungriness could
be eradicated
globally.
In conclusion
, although teaching past
events
have several benefits, I contend learning relevant lessons to science and
technology
can be more profitable.
Therefore
, these high-priority subjects
must
be put
in the school syllabus.