There is a common discussion about the relevance of History subject and its impact in education. One's believe that in the modern world History subject lost its significance in comparison with the disciplines such as science and technology, whereas others think vice versa. I think that the first opinion is much closer to me. This essay will discuss both points of view.
On the one hand, some people hold the view that in the modern technological era efficiency of History subject decreases over time. It happens because nowadays technologies surround people everywhere, modern technique is being used in all of common spheres of our life. Consequently, these conditions are forcing people to interact with technologies, and creating a situation where knowledge of how the technologies work started intended as a necessary requirement of the modern and successful person. For instance, at this time, specialists in case of science and technologies are in greater demand, comparing with specialists in different spheres.
However, others believe that the knowledge of history expands on people' outmind and develops their human-interacting skills. They think that people who are more enlightened in History are smarter than others in cause of experience that is based on the mistakes of their ancestors. Apparently, History can really help people to become outminded and suited, but in the modern time these qualities are obliged to lose their benefits and grind to a halt of the new digital world. For example, nowadays, if the normal person needs an information about history he will search an information throughout the internet rather than refer to an expert in history.
To conclude, despite of the views differ about the significance of learning history, I believe that other spheres of education will have larger range of uses in the new era.
There is a common discussion about the relevance of
History
subject and its impact in education.
One's
believe that in the
modern
world
History
subject lost its significance
in comparison
with the disciplines such as science and
technology
, whereas others
think
vice versa. I
think
that the
first
opinion is much closer to me. This essay will discuss both points of view.
On the one hand,
some
people
hold the view that in the
modern
technological era efficiency of
History
subject decreases over time. It happens
because
nowadays
technologies
surround
people
everywhere,
modern
technique is being
used
in all of common spheres of our life.
Consequently
, these conditions are forcing
people
to interact with
technologies
, and creating a situation where knowledge of how the
technologies
work
started
intended as a necessary requirement of the
modern
and successful person.
For instance
, at this time, specialists in case of science and
technologies
are in greater demand, comparing with specialists in
different
spheres.
However
, others believe that the knowledge of
history
expands on
people
'
outmind
and develops their human-interacting
skills
. They
think
that
people
who are more enlightened in
History
are smarter than others in cause of experience that
is based
on the mistakes of their ancestors.
Apparently
,
History
can
really
help
people
to become
outminded
and suited,
but
in the
modern
time these qualities
are obliged
to lose their benefits and grind to a halt of the new digital world.
For example
, nowadays, if the normal person needs an information about
history
he will search an information throughout the internet
rather
than refer to an expert in history.
To conclude
,
despite of
the views differ about the significance of learning
history
, I believe that
other
spheres of education will have larger range of
uses
in the new era.