There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically. As a result, some people believe that non-academic subjects, such as physical education and cookery, should be removed from the school syllabus so that children can concentrate on academic work.

In contemporary society, young individuals face immense pressure to excel academically, leading to a debate about the relevance of non-academic subjects in the school curriculum. Some argue that subjects like physical education and cookery should be removed to allow students to focus solely on their academic pursuits. However, I contend that non-academic subjects play a crucial role in fostering well-rounded individuals. On one hand, non-academic subjects such as physical education and cookery equip students with essential life skills. Engaging in physical education promotes teamwork and physical fitness, while cookery teaches valuable culinary skills that are beneficial for independent living. Moreover, these subjects provide a necessary break from rigorous academic studies, allowing students to recharge and return to their studies with renewed focus. Conversely, proponents of removing these subjects argue that it would free up valuable time for academic learning. While it is true that students could allocate more time to subjects like mathematics and science, this perspective overlooks the holistic development that non-academic subjects provide. A balanced education should encompass both academic and non-academic learning, as each contributes to the overall growth of a student. In conclusion, while the pressure to succeed academically is undeniable, eliminating non-academic subjects from the curriculum would be a disservice to students. A well-rounded education that includes both academic and non-academic subjects is essential for nurturing capable and adaptable individuals.