It is an ongoing debate between two groups of people. Former group thinks that allowing children to make their own choices in daily matters would generate a community which is selfish. Latter group believes that it is necessary for children to make decisions related to them. Before giving my opinion both views need to be critiqued with suitable examples in the ensuing paragraphs.
Discussing the former view, the foremost argument put forward by the supporters is parents should restrict their child to take a decisions about everyday matters. A young man does not know what is good and what is not. They do not know the impacts of their choices on the society. For example, number of rape cases has increased in my home country India. Clothing pattern of girls as well as thinking pattern of boys can leads to such crimes. Moreover, entertainment such as, drinking and smoking can affect health. Furthermore, some rules are mandatory to make for the better health and a great future of a child. Therefore, if guardians would not restrict, independence will increase in the community. Which can result in a selfish society.
On the other hand, latter people believe that children have their rights to make their own choices. In this era children are smart enough to choose what is benificial for them and what is not. For instance, in my Hindu religion non-veg food is not acceptable. However, in some cases such as, bone fracture non-veg food is necessary for healing. Additionally, comfert zone along with needs of youngsters regarding to the everyday things should be choosen by Thereby, pupils should be granted to take their own decisions which affect them.
To conclude and give my opinion, adults should be allowed to make all things on their own way. Which will be benificial for their lifestyle. In a result, it would generate a society with free minded individuals who are able to do anything related to them.
It is an ongoing debate between two groups of
people
. Former group
thinks
that allowing
children
to
make
their
own
choices in daily matters would generate a community which is selfish. Latter group believes that it is necessary for
children
to
make
decisions related to them.
Before
giving my opinion both views need to
be critiqued
with suitable examples in the ensuing paragraphs.
Discussing the former view, the foremost argument put forward by the supporters is parents should restrict their child to take
a decisions
about everyday matters. A young
man
does not know what is
good
and what is not. They do not know the impacts of their choices on the society.
For example
, number of rape cases has increased in my home country India. Clothing pattern of girls
as well
as thinking pattern of boys can leads to such crimes.
Moreover
, entertainment such as, drinking and smoking can affect health.
Furthermore
,
some
rules
are mandatory to
make
for the better health and a great future of a child.
Therefore
, if guardians would not restrict, independence will increase in the community.
Which
can result in a selfish society.
On the other hand
, latter
people
believe that
children
have their rights to
make
their
own
choices. In this era
children
are smart
enough
to choose what is
benificial
for them and what is not.
For instance
, in my Hindu religion non-veg food is not acceptable.
However
, in
some
cases such as, bone fracture non-veg food is necessary for healing.
Additionally
,
comfert
zone along with needs of youngsters
regarding to
the everyday things should be
choosen
by Thereby, pupils should
be granted
to take their
own
decisions which affect them.
To conclude
and give my opinion, adults should be
allowed
to
make
all things on their
own
way. Which will be
benificial
for their lifestyle. In a result, it would generate a society with free minded individuals who are able to do anything related to them.