It is indeed a fact that life is easier when there are fewer languages is an argumentum topic in current society. Some people believe that using very limited languages is very imperative and it is more helpful for appropriate communication and to share critical information. However, Others opine that restricting for fewer languages are not beneficial and as a result, it could be disappeared some vital languages from the world. However, I elaborate on both views in the below paragraphs.
On the one hand, it is accepted that using fewer languages is more profited and it is proving an independent platform for communication. Not only that sharing information through a few languages will help in improving day-to-day business and can deliver lots of financial benefits due to the proper understanding of the statements. For instant, according to the research done by the University of California, it has been reported that more people are affectionate to talk a few languages because it makes their life easier. Therefore, collaborating and exploring people's ideas through less languages have more gravity than others.
On the other hand, some communities are rising with different thoughts on this topic. People highlighting that using fewer languages not providing a good background for respectable communication and share communities thinking. For example, it has been highlighted that lots of languages are getting die due to not practicing. Also, this would be led to unnecessary problems in societies. As an example, a popular magazine from Canada reported, this is a serious situation and language dying would be resulted in the demolishing history of mankind.
Considering all the above, it can be concluded that even fewer languages make human life easier, we need to be considered and take necessary precautions to mitigate the losing important languages from the earth.
It is
indeed
a fact that life is easier when there are fewer
languages
is an
argumentum
topic in
current
society.
Some
people
believe that using
very
limited
languages
is
very
imperative and it is more helpful for appropriate communication and to share critical information.
However
, Others opine that restricting for fewer
languages
are not beneficial and
as a result
, it could
be disappeared
some
vital
languages
from the world.
However
, I elaborate on both views in the below paragraphs.
On the one hand, it is
accepted
that using fewer
languages
is more profited and it is proving an independent platform for communication. Not
only
that sharing information through a few
languages
will
help
in improving day-to-day business and can deliver lots of financial benefits due to the proper understanding of the statements. For instant, according to the research done by the University of California, it has
been reported
that more
people
are affectionate to talk a few
languages
because
it
makes
their life easier.
Therefore
, collaborating and exploring
people
's
ideas
through
less
languages
have more gravity than others.
On the other hand
,
some
communities are rising with
different
thoughts on this topic.
People
highlighting that using fewer
languages
not providing a
good
background for respectable communication and share communities thinking.
For example
, it has
been highlighted
that lots of
languages
are getting
die
due to not practicing.
Also
, this would
be led
to unnecessary problems in societies. As an example, a popular magazine from Canada reported, this is a serious situation and
language
dying would
be resulted
in the demolishing history of mankind.
Considering all the above, it can
be concluded
that even fewer
languages
make
human life easier, we need to
be considered
and take necessary precautions to mitigate the losing
important
languages
from the earth.