Having healthy public people is one of the essential dreams for every government. Some individuals believe that enhancing sport equipments are very useful, but the others think it should evaluate the other factors as well. There are rational arguments on both sides of this challengable topic which will be discussed in detail, followed by my own opinion.
On the one hand, doing workout by the public needs sport facilities to have vibrant society. It is necessary to have huge numbers of sport facilities as a free in most public places such as parks, shopping malls. It must be easy for people to reach to exercising equipments less than 10 minutes as if they are always ready to use. For example, by employing some free gym facilities in bus station, most passengers can do exercise rather than just waste time by waiting for the bus. Thus, under no circumstances is it not acceptable to have healthy people without doing sport.
On the other hand, sport is not the only factor to determine as a clue of improving public health. Government authorities have more responsibility to enhance public health as well. Other factors such as social behaviour, criminal activity and charity affairs can be an essential part of rational measuring of healthy public. As an illustration, most of organs which are responsible to the mentioned factors can prepare annual reports. Therefore, all of these reports the company with sport activities can be considered as a final measurement of public health.
To conclude, there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy, however, it is my firm conviction that attention should be more to sport activities. Most of the health problem is coming from lack of body activity. It would be highly recommended that governments involved in improving public health by regulating of enforcing companies to put their employees on mandatory exercises.
Having healthy
public
people
is
one of the essential dreams for every
government
.
Some
individuals believe that enhancing
sport
equipments are
very
useful,
but
the others
think
it should evaluate the
other
factors
as well
. There are rational arguments on both sides of this
challengable
topic which will
be discussed
in detail, followed by my
own
opinion.
On the one hand, doing workout by the
public
needs
sport
facilities to have vibrant society. It is necessary to have huge numbers of
sport
facilities as a free in most
public
places such as parks, shopping malls. It
must
be easy for
people
to reach to exercising equipments less than 10 minutes as if they are always ready to
use
.
For example
, by employing
some
free gym facilities in bus station, most passengers can do exercise
rather
than
just
waste time by waiting for the bus.
Thus
, under no circumstances is it not acceptable to have healthy
people
without doing sport.
On the
other
hand,
sport
is not the
only
factor
to determine as a clue of improving
public
health
.
Government
authorities have more responsibility to enhance
public
health
as well
.
Other
factors
such as social
behaviour
, criminal
activity
and charity affairs can be an essential part of rational measuring of healthy
public
. As an illustration,
most of organs
which are responsible to the mentioned
factors
can prepare annual reports.
Therefore
, all of these reports the
company
with
sport
activities
can
be considered
as a final measurement of
public
health.
To conclude
, there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy,
however
, it is my firm conviction that attention should be more to
sport
activities
. Most of the
health
problem is coming from lack of body
activity
. It would be
highly
recommended that
governments
involved in improving
public
health
by regulating of enforcing
companies
to put their employees on mandatory exercises.