The method of counteracting the worst episodes by people has become a mooted issue. Few intellectuals perceive that an individual should willingly mould himself with the surroundings, while others opine that one should adopt a lucrative approach to modify the existing situations by using hard work. This essay will discuss both the views of the above notion along with my opinion.
To begin with, the former view, which suggests the conventional way to adjust with the difficult tasks. This approach is the most simple, effective and short run method to overcome the harshness of the life. Although, this approach is effective for short run, it reduces the conflicts between the people and provides the happiness to them. For instance, the impact of the problems regarding the scarcity of money and uncertainty at workplace could be curbed by accepting it and change the actions according to the situations. Thus, by accepting the worst situation, one could get an idea to live with that surroundings.
On the other hand, the latter view is more optimistic; where, the people must have to put corrective actions to eradicate the sabotage episodes. This approach is not only encouraging a layman to live in degraded situations, but also motivate him to put efforts to change the current situation. Moreover, such approach of the scientists has introduced many innovations in our community. For example, the barriers of communication and the transportation were faded by using many inventions in the industrial age. As a result, the standard of living of the people has been improved.
In conclusion, it is indeed that the necessity is the origin of the innovation. In my opinion, the latter view is more effective and productive for the people to enhance their life in a sustainable way. However, it is also good to accept a few things in our life, such as a scarcity of fossil fuel for the prosperity of the society.
The method of counteracting the worst episodes by
people
has
become a mooted issue. Few intellectuals perceive that an individual should
willingly
mould
himself with the surroundings, while others opine that one should adopt a lucrative
approach
to modify the existing
situations
by using
hard
work. This essay will discuss both the
views
of the above notion along with my opinion.
To
begin
with, the former
view
, which suggests the conventional way to adjust with the difficult tasks. This
approach
is
the most simple
, effective and short run method to overcome the harshness of the life. Although, this
approach
is effective for short run, it
reduces
the conflicts between the
people
and provides the happiness to them.
For instance
, the impact of the problems regarding the scarcity of money and uncertainty at workplace could
be curbed
by accepting it and
change
the actions according to the
situations
.
Thus
, by accepting the worst
situation
, one could
get
an
idea
to
live
with that surroundings.
On the other hand
, the latter
view
is more optimistic; where, the
people
must
have to
put corrective actions to eradicate the sabotage episodes. This
approach
is not
only
encouraging a layman to
live
in degraded
situations
,
but
also
motivate him to put efforts to
change
the
current
situation
.
Moreover
, such
approach
of the scientists has introduced
many
innovations in our community.
For example
, the barriers of communication and the transportation
were faded
by using
many
inventions in the industrial age.
As a result
, the standard of living of the
people
has been
improved
.
In conclusion
, it is
indeed
that the necessity is the origin of the innovation. In my opinion, the latter
view
is more effective and productive for the
people
to enhance their life
in a sustainable way
.
However
, it is
also
good
to accept a few things in our life, such as a scarcity of fossil fuel for the prosperity of the society.