It has been a long-standing discussion about whether the outcome of the research done in any field, such as science, business and academics, should be made public or should it be made private to gain profits. In this essay, I will discuss both the points of views using the real-life examples to support arguments.
Making an outcome of a research publicly available has plentiful benefits. The results of a research can be used by numerous groups of people, including scholars, scientists, or engineers, to potentially accelerate the work in their respective fields. For example, a group of IT professionals can use a research done by bio-medical scientists to develop an app that could diagnose the dangerous diseases. Moreover, a freely available researched idea can improve the quality of product produced by two competing companies. Not only this, but also it helps increase the business, which in turn benefits the economy of a country and eventually poor people gain the benefits.
However, some people are not in favour of making the research material publicly available, which has a very bad impact on the growth of any domain. Instead of making an information private for mere monetary gains, it should be made available to other people to use it. It not only prevails the sense of competition, but also keep improving the respective fields. If scientists stop sharing their research results for money than the companies would fail to introduce new products in markets which would have awful effects on the economies of the world.
In summary, making a research available for everyone has more benefits than hiding it from the people. Therefore, the groups of people or companies should create a culture of open source and share information with each other. After a detailed analysis, I am in complete favour of sharing the information.
It has been a long-standing discussion about whether the outcome of the
research
done in any field, such as science, business and academics, should
be made
public or should it
be made
private to gain profits. In this essay, I will discuss both the points of views using the real-life examples to support arguments.
Making an outcome of a
research
publicly
available
has plentiful benefits. The results of a
research
can be
used
by numerous groups of
people
, including scholars, scientists, or engineers, to
potentially
accelerate the work in their respective fields.
For example
, a group of IT professionals can
use
a
research
done by bio-medical scientists to develop an app that could diagnose the
dangerous
diseases.
Moreover
, a
freely
available
researched
idea
can
improve
the quality of product produced by two competing
companies
. Not
only
this,
but
also
it
helps
increase the business, which in turn benefits the economy of a country and
eventually
poor
people
gain the benefits.
However
,
some
people
are not in
favour
of making the
research
material
publicly
available
, which has a
very
bad
impact on the growth of any domain.
Instead
of making an information private for mere monetary gains, it should
be made
available
to other
people
to
use
it. It not
only
prevails the sense of competition,
but
also
keep
improving the respective fields. If scientists
stop
sharing their
research
results for money than the
companies
would fail to introduce new products in markets which would have awful effects on the economies of the world.
In summary, making a
research
available
for everyone has more benefits than hiding it from the
people
.
Therefore
, the groups of
people
or
companies
should create a culture of open source and share information with each other. After a detailed analysis, I am in complete
favour
of sharing the information.