These days people have access to a lot of data. The question of how much information should be shared in such fields as science, business and academic world is becoming more important. It is considered by some that most information should be shared, while there are others who think it should not be shared freely. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my own opinion.
On the one hand, collaboration between people leads to faster results. When scientists exchange information freely, allowing their colleagues to read current papers, they might produce better outcomes compared to working on their own and having only their research. As a result, medical advances and new breakthroughs might be made thanks to open data.
On the other hand, sharing information openly might have some detrimental impacts. People with wrong intentions might use available information for illegal purposes and, thus, such data should be safeguarded. For example, the instructions on how to make a bomb are too valuable and should not be shared freely. In addition, business people or scientists want to avoid having their work stolen. They do not reveal the details of their projects because others might profit from copying other people’s original work. I completely agree with this opinion and think that most data have to be protected and kept private.
In conclusion, though sharing data might be a valuable tool, some information should not be shared freely. An obvious plus of having open data is cooperation and collaboration that might lead to a greater good. However, the disadvantages are that one might use information for wrong purposes or steal data. I believe that information should not be shared openly.
These days
people
have access to
a lot of
data
. The question of how much
information
should be
shared
in such fields as science, business and academic world is becoming more
important
. It
is considered
by
some
that most
information
should be
shared
, while there are others who
think
it should not be
shared
freely
. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my
own
opinion.
On the one hand, collaboration between
people
leads
to faster results. When scientists exchange
information
freely
, allowing their colleagues to read
current
papers, they
might
produce better outcomes compared to working on their
own
and having
only
their research.
As a result
, medical advances and new breakthroughs
might
be made
thanks to open data.
On the
other
hand, sharing
information
openly
might
have
some
detrimental impacts.
People
with
wrong
intentions
might
use
available
information
for illegal purposes and,
thus
, such
data
should
be safeguarded
.
For example
, the instructions on how to
make
a bomb are too valuable and should not be
shared
freely
.
In addition
, business
people
or scientists want to avoid having their work stolen. They do not reveal the
details
of their projects
because
others
might
profit from copying
other
people’s
original work. I completely
agree
with this opinion and
think
that most
data
have to
be protected
and
kept
private.
In conclusion
, though sharing
data
might
be a valuable tool,
some
information
should not be
shared
freely
. An obvious plus of having open
data
is cooperation and collaboration that
might
lead to a greater
good
.
However
, the disadvantages are that one
might
use
information
for
wrong
purposes or steal
data
. I believe that
information
should not be
shared
openly
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
39Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes