Based on some opinion, sharing as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world is a recommendation that promises to bring about profound benefits. Nevertheless, some information that is of paramount importance or holds a significant level of value should suggestively be used exclusively rather than shared inclusively. Personally judging, despite both perspectives possessing a degree of accuracy, publishing research documents publicly to reach the most significant audience helps improve the research itself while promoting growth for the entire scientific scope.
On the one hand, having research information reached as many people as possible not only enhances the process of having the journal assessed critically, but also improves other academic articles in the same field. In detail, despite the tremendous effort that counts by blood and soul to produce a research journal, flaws inevitably exist as a nature of every circumstance that involves humans. Thus, every published research generally receives a process of criticism from other experts in the field, which ultimately identifies the problems for which authors can take the advantage to improve in the future. Also, by reviewing information in a research result, other authors that focus on closely-related topics may advance their own articles, which eventually boosts the advancement of the whole field.
On the other hand, unfinished research topics that laws and regulations are insufficient to protect the contained information require a different approach to preserve confidentiality. In detail, laws systems start protecting information in research from copyright infringement after the journals have the publishment on official platforms. However, for younger scientists or people with the lack of ability to publish scientific research, sharing it can incline the probability of having the information used illegally by others.
To conclude, despite the fear of letting the research that has consumed not only effort but academic performances of authors use by others, publishing research officially is promised to produce the best benefits of having it protected by laws and improving the research result
Based on
some
opinion, sharing as much
information
as possible in scientific
research
, business, and the academic world is a recommendation that promises to bring about profound benefits.
Nevertheless
,
some
information
that is
of paramount importance or holds a significant level of value should
suggestively
be
used
exclusively
rather
than shared
inclusively
.
Personally
judging, despite both perspectives possessing a degree of accuracy, publishing
research
documents
publicly
to reach the most significant audience
helps
improve
the
research
itself while promoting growth for the entire scientific scope.
On the one hand,
having
research
information
reached as
many
people
as possible not
only
enhances the process of
having
the journal assessed
critically
,
but
also
improves
other
academic articles in the same field. In detail, despite the tremendous effort that counts by blood and soul to produce a
research
journal, flaws
inevitably
exist as a nature of every circumstance that involves humans.
Thus
, every published
research
generally
receives a process of criticism from
other
experts in the field, which
ultimately
identifies the problems for which authors can take the advantage to
improve
in the future.
Also
, by reviewing
information
in a
research
result,
other
authors that focus on
closely
-related topics may advance their
own
articles, which
eventually
boosts the advancement of the whole field.
On the
other
hand, unfinished
research
topics that laws and regulations are insufficient to protect the contained
information
require a
different
approach to preserve confidentiality. In detail, laws systems
start
protecting
information
in
research
from copyright infringement after the journals have the
publishment
on official platforms.
However
, for younger scientists or
people
with the lack of ability to publish scientific
research
, sharing it can incline the probability of
having
the
information
used
illegally
by others.
To conclude
, despite the fear of letting the
research
that has consumed not
only
effort
but
academic performances of authors
use
by others, publishing
research
officially
is promised
to produce the best benefits of
having
it protected by laws and improving the
research
result