In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support and opposing this policy, and give your own opinion. v.6

These days, there is a vexed issue that people who, drive cars in the downtown, have to pay extra cost to cross the street around it because this cost is a policy to alleviate several problems that have been recently occurred. Exponents of this idea deliberate the extra payment as a key answer to severe traffic congestion and air pollution issue. However, the protesters consider this idea rather than dubious and disadvantageous. Apropos to this side, a road fee bring merely an exclusivity to prosperous citizens. To them who say agree, creating a payment system at some crowded avenues could significantly reduce traffic jam as a predominant problem and shraply decrease air pollution as a side effect of it. When a road fee is implemented in certain focuses of city, it also transform the way of life of citizens. Take Electronic Road Pricing at Orchard, Singapore as an exemplification. Although at the first time they have a little misinterpretation of the new regulation on the road, people have changing the way of their mobility to this road without driving their personal vehicles which induced gridlock and unhealthy air quality jeopardize its existence. Most of those people use subway and bus as amelioration of social and environmental issue which is an enormous movement of city living. Nonetheless, the contrary view emphasized the paid road system such an ineffective program towards fabulously affluent society. An additional cost might well alter the lifestyle of medium class society to garage their cars at home because they take the view that this cost is extortionately expensive and they realize the responsibility to create a better environment with reducing Carbon Monoxide. Ironically, while some people are avoiding to drive car and use public transportation as an alternative, wealthy people could pass the street easily with forgetting their contribution to air pollution and traffic congestion. Also, disgracefully, those rich citizens increase the volume of traffic on the road which creates an exclusive boulevard for them. This could substantiate an inequitable of paid road on the other perspective. In conclusion, I would contend agree, the street payment system might be helpful in certain conditions, where there are virtues of implementation and straight purpose on it. Nevertheless, in actual situations, not every human being could allow their mindset to contribute to this policy.