Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support and opposing this policy, and give your own opinion. v.6

In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support and opposing this policy, and give your own opinion. v. 6
These days, there is a vexed issue that people who, drive cars in the downtown, have to pay extra cost to cross the street around it because this cost is a policy to alleviate several problems that have been recently occurred. Exponents of this idea deliberate the extra payment as a key answer to severe traffic congestion and air pollution issue. However, the protesters consider this idea rather than dubious and disadvantageous. Apropos to this side, a road fee bring merely an exclusivity to prosperous citizens. To them who say agree, creating a payment system at some crowded avenues could significantly reduce traffic jam as a predominant problem and shraply decrease air pollution as a side effect of it. When a road fee is implemented in certain focuses of city, it also transform the way of life of citizens. Take Electronic Road Pricing at Orchard, Singapore as an exemplification. Although at the first time they have a little misinterpretation of the new regulation on the road, people have changing the way of their mobility to this road without driving their personal vehicles which induced gridlock and unhealthy air quality jeopardize its existence. Most of those people use subway and bus as amelioration of social and environmental issue which is an enormous movement of city living. Nonetheless, the contrary view emphasized the paid road system such an ineffective program towards fabulously affluent society. An additional cost might well alter the lifestyle of medium class society to garage their cars at home because they take the view that this cost is extortionately expensive and they realize the responsibility to create a better environment with reducing Carbon Monoxide. Ironically, while some people are avoiding to drive car and use public transportation as an alternative, wealthy people could pass the street easily with forgetting their contribution to air pollution and traffic congestion. Also, disgracefully, those rich citizens increase the volume of traffic on the road which creates an exclusive boulevard for them. This could substantiate an inequitable of paid road on the other perspective. In conclusion, I would contend agree, the street payment system might be helpful in certain conditions, where there are virtues of implementation and straight purpose on it. Nevertheless, in actual situations, not every human being could allow their mindset to contribute to this policy.
These days, there is a vexed issue that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who, drive cars in the downtown,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
pay extra
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
to cross the street around it
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
is a policy to alleviate several problems that have been recently occurred. Exponents of this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
deliberate the extra payment as a key answer to severe
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
pollution issue.
However
, the protesters consider this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
rather
than dubious and disadvantageous. Apropos to this side, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
fee bring
merely
an exclusivity to prosperous citizens.

To them who say
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
, creating a payment system at
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
crowded avenues could
significantly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
jam as a predominant problem and
Possible spelling mistake found.
shraply
decrease
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
pollution as a side effect of it. When a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
fee
is implemented
in certain focuses of city, it
also
Did you mean "transforms"?
transform
the way of life of citizens. Take Electronic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Road
Pricing at Orchard, Singapore as an exemplification. Although at the
first
time they have a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
misinterpretation of the new regulation on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have changing the way of their mobility to this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
without driving their personal vehicles which induced gridlock and unhealthy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
quality jeopardize its existence. Most of those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
subway and bus as amelioration of social and environmental issue which is an enormous movement of city living.

Nonetheless, the contrary view emphasized the paid
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
system such an ineffective program towards
fabulously
affluent society. An additional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
might well alter the lifestyle of medium
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
society to garage their cars at home
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they take the view that this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
is
extortionately
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
expensive and
they realize the responsibility to create a better environment with reducing Carbon Monoxide.
Ironically
, while
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are avoiding to drive car and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
public transportation as an alternative, wealthy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
could pass the street
easily
with forgetting their contribution to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
pollution and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion.
Also
,
disgracefully
, those rich citizens increase the volume of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
which creates an exclusive boulevard for them. This could substantiate
The phrase 'an inequitable of' is not correct. Use a noun, not an adjective, between 'an' and 'of'.
an inequitable of
paid
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
on the other perspective.

In conclusion
, I would contend
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
, the street payment system might be helpful in certain conditions, where there are virtues of implementation and straight purpose on it.
Nevertheless
, in actual situations, not every human being could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
their mindset to contribute to this policy.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
25Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes
You can never understand one language until you understand at least two.
Geoffrey Willans

IELTS letter In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support and opposing this policy, and give your own opinion. v. 6

Letter
  American English
4 paragraphs
384 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts