It is tempting to think that finishing a project with members who have totally different ideas could rise the diversity of the team, leading to a better result of the team asignment. Nevertheless, from my perspective, working with people who share similiar opinions is a more effective way to achieve success.
On the one hand, teaming up with classmates of similar kind will reduce the cost of communication, which result from disagreements among team members. People who share the same character with each other are more likely to reach into an aggreement quicker and easier since they share similar logical partten. On the contrary, it is difficuty for total groups of students to agree with each other, which not only could cause conflicts among members but also waste significant amont of time for each student during the process of negotication. My roomate, for instance, once teamed up with her classmate to deliver a prosentation in Marketing class. Unfortunately, she and her team member shared totally different value and interest. My roomate wanted to force on finance industry and to make her PowerPoint look more professional. However, her classmate' s merely interest was video gomes and he insisted to make their presentaion more entertain and interesting. Eventually, their cooperation went to an dad end. They had to do their whole work again seperatedly a few days before the deadline.
On the other hand, it is almost impossible to find a perfect time of meeting for every team member if they have totally different thoughts. The same kind of student are likely to have identitcal life style as well. It is not surprising, for example, that hard-working students usually get up early and usually do not stay up late. Nonetheless, people who enjoy night clubs and bars could not regulate themselves as strictly as other students. Taken my own experience as an example, I initially work with six people in my Business Comunication class to finish homwork. Some people were eager to finish it sooner while others did not want to start it untill deadline. Hard as we tried, we could only not find a proper time for everone and our homework was finished in hurry.
Admittedly, having a bunch of people who have different ideas could bring the team with fresh thoughs and unique perspects of solving problems. Nevertheless, a relatively simple school work asigned by teachers, such as a presentation for English class or a Math question, is unlikely to be so complicated that so many different views and creativity are needed.
In summary, there is no doubt that working with people of similar mind is a more efficient method to finish a task because similar people usaully are easiler to communicate, and that it will be less exhasuted to arrange a suitable time for meeting for each team member.
It is tempting to
think
that finishing a project with
members
who
have
totally
different
ideas
could rise the diversity of the
team
, leading to a better result of the
team
asignment
.
Nevertheless
, from my perspective, working with
people
who
share
similiar
opinions is a more effective way to achieve success.
On the one hand, teaming up with classmates of
similar
kind will
reduce
the cost of communication, which result from disagreements among
team
members
.
People
who
share the same character with each
other
are more likely to reach into an
aggreement
quicker and easier since they share
similar
logical
partten
.
On the contrary
, it is
difficuty
for total groups of
students
to
agree
with each
other
, which not
only
could cause conflicts among
members
but
also
waste significant
amont
of
time
for each
student
during the process of
negotication
. My
roomate
,
for instance
, once teamed up with her classmate to deliver a
prosentation
in Marketing
class
. Unfortunately, she and her
team
member
shared
totally
different
value and interest. My
roomate
wanted to force on finance industry and to
make
her PowerPoint look more professional.
However
, her
classmate&
#039; s
merely
interest was video
gomes and
he insisted to
make
their
presentaion
more entertain and interesting.
Eventually
, their cooperation went to
an
dad
end
. They had to do their whole work again
seperatedly
a few days
before
the deadline.
On the
other
hand, it is almost impossible to find a perfect
time
of meeting for every
team
member
if they have
totally
different
thoughts. The same kind of
student
are likely to have
identitcal
life style
as well
. It is not surprising,
for example
, that
hard
-working
students
usually
get
up early and
usually
do not stay up late. Nonetheless,
people
who
enjoy night clubs and bars could not regulate themselves as
strictly
as
other
students
. Taken my
own
experience as an example, I
initially
work with six
people
in my Business
Comunication
class
to finish
homwork
.
Some
people
were eager to finish it sooner while others did not want to
start
it
untill
deadline.
Hard
as we tried, we could
only
not find a proper
time
for
everone
and our homework
was finished
in hurry.
Admittedly
, having a bunch of
people
who
have
different
ideas
could bring the
team
with fresh
thoughs
and unique
perspects
of solving problems.
Nevertheless
, a
relatively
simple school work
asigned
by teachers, such as a presentation for English
class
or a Math question, is unlikely to be
so
complicated that
so
many
different
views and creativity
are needed
.
In summary, there is no doubt that working with
people
of
similar
mind is a more efficient method to finish a task
because
similar
people
usaully
are
easiler
to communicate, and that it will be less
exhasuted
to arrange a suitable
time
for meeting for each
team
member
.