In recent years there has been a considerable rise in criminal activities. It is a common belief, that common people are committing the same crime as the murderer by giving them a death sentence. Instead, should be given life imprisonment. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the topic.
First and foremost, there should be a strong investigation prior to the sentence. Most of the time, the guilty might have no criminal background and was never involved in any criminal activities. For instance, sometimes people do hurt others in order to save themselves or someone from getting hurt. Instead, they call medical emergencies and make every possible attempt to save the person. They should be given a little forgiveness and should not be treated like a real criminal. As a result, the common people would be saved from committing a crime by hanging someone who had no intention of a crime.
On the other hand, the criminal who has motives behind a crime are the one's the law needs to deal in a harsh manner. Those are the perpetrators, society should be scared of. They are not fit enough to live in a society and should be given the death penalty. For example, there have been cases where people feel happy in killing someone. They enjoy the suffering of other people and won't stop after killing one person. Furthermore, the prison has limited space and no tax payers money should be used to feed people like them. As a result. Anyone who kills with a motive, should be hanged.
In conclusion. Despite murderers being kept in prison are fed by tax payers. In my view, anyone who has committed a crime unintentionally doesn't deserve to be treated the same as one with motives and their cases should be given little leniency.
In recent years there has been a considerable rise in
criminal
activities. It is a common belief, that common
people
are committing the same
crime
as the murderer by giving them a death sentence.
Instead
, should be
given
life imprisonment. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the topic.
First
and foremost, there should be a strong investigation prior to the sentence. Most of the time, the guilty might have no
criminal
background and was never involved in any
criminal
activities.
For instance
,
sometimes
people
do hurt others in order to save themselves or someone from getting hurt.
Instead
, they call medical emergencies and
make
every possible attempt to save the person. They should be
given
a
little
forgiveness and should not
be treated
like a real
criminal
.
As a result
, the common
people
would
be saved
from committing a
crime
by hanging someone
who
had no intention of a crime.
On the other hand
, the
criminal
who
has motives behind a
crime
are the one's the law needs to deal
in a harsh manner
. Those are the perpetrators, society should
be scared
of. They are not fit
enough
to
live
in a society and should be
given
the death penalty.
For example
, there have been cases where
people
feel happy in killing someone. They enjoy the suffering of other
people
and won't
stop
after killing one person.
Furthermore
, the prison has limited space and no tax payers money should be
used
to feed
people
like them.
As a result
. Anyone
who
kills with a motive, should
be hanged
.
In conclusion
. Despite murderers being
kept
in prison
are fed
by tax payers. In my view, anyone
who
has committed a
crime
unintentionally
doesn't deserve to
be treated
the same as one with motives and their cases should be
given
little
leniency.