Globalisation is a catchall term that refers to any activity that involves more than one country, to illustrate, travels from one country to another. The dramatic increase in transnational travel in recent years has sparked controversy over the potential impacts of this trend on individual countries, especially those new member states of globalisation. Some people are concerned that the upsurge in new arrivals will prompt local hostility against visitors, rather of promoting their understanding on mutual cultural background. This notion should be rejected as one can see many facts in favour of this development between countries.
Firstly, the main reason why international travels would never bring conflict is rooted in the fact that both visitors and locals are economically motivated. International travel opens up opportunities for business development throughout the world. Entrepreneurs are interested not only in the domestic market, but also in the overseas market. Foreigners should learn the culture of a country before winning over the local people. In turn, locals should show their hospitality to visitors in exchange for their trust. They share a view that acceptance of each other's cultural background is a necessary condition for cooperation.
Understanding a culture has other implications. Differences in social background, cultural values and religious belief might make the discrepancy of foreigners and local inhabitants on some issues indelible; however, the higher interaction, the higher level of communication and understanding. Arabians, for example, used to consider westerners as their foes. Now they have concrete relations with their western allies in many fields. In the initial stage, their divergence seemed inherent but over time, with better mutual understanding, they take the same position on many issues.
Undeniably, it is likely that in some resorts, foreign visitors repel the local community with their scant regard for the local environment and conventions when they first arrive. Although, it should be noted that most offences are accidental, rather than intentional. Instead, visitors disobey rules and conventions simply because they have no knowledge of them. This situation is expected to be improved with the passing of time when visitors from different countries increase their knowledge of a local culture.
To conclude, according to the above analysis, we can observe that the increase in the international travel should not be taken as the cause of any conflict that arises between two countries. Alternatively, people should recognise their role in improving mutual understanding between two countries.
Globalisation
is a catchall term that refers to any activity that involves more than one
country
, to illustrate,
travels
from one
country
to another. The dramatic increase in transnational
travel
in recent years has sparked controversy over the potential impacts of this trend on individual
countries
,
especially
those new member states of
globalisation
.
Some
people
are concerned
that the upsurge in new arrivals will prompt
local
hostility against
visitors
,
rather
of promoting their
understanding
on mutual cultural background. This notion should
be rejected
as one can
see
many
facts in
favour
of this development between countries.
Firstly
, the main reason why international
travels
would never bring conflict
is rooted
in the fact that both
visitors
and
locals
are
economically
motivated. International
travel
opens up opportunities for business development throughout the world. Entrepreneurs
are interested
not
only
in the domestic market,
but
also
in the overseas market. Foreigners should learn the culture of a
country
before
winning over the
local
people
. In turn,
locals
should
show
their hospitality to
visitors
in exchange for their trust. They share a view that acceptance of each other's cultural background is a necessary condition for cooperation.
Understanding a culture has other implications. Differences in social background, cultural values and religious belief might
make
the discrepancy of foreigners and
local
inhabitants on
some
issues indelible;
however
, the higher interaction, the higher level of communication and
understanding
. Arabians,
for example
,
used
to consider westerners as their foes.
Now
they have concrete relations with their western allies in
many
fields. In the initial stage, their divergence seemed inherent
but
over time, with better mutual
understanding
, they take the same position on
many
issues.
Undeniably
, it is likely that in
some
resorts, foreign
visitors
repel the
local
community with their scant regard for the
local
environment and conventions when they
first
arrive. Although, it should
be noted
that most
offences
are accidental,
rather
than intentional.
Instead
,
visitors
disobey
rules
and conventions
simply
because
they have no knowledge of them. This situation is
expected
to be
improved
with the passing of time when
visitors
from
different
countries
increase their knowledge of a
local
culture.
To conclude
, according to the above analysis, we can observe that the increase in the international
travel
should not
be taken
as the cause of any conflict that arises between two
countries
.
Alternatively
,
people
should
recognise
their role in improving mutual
understanding
between two
countries
.