NOWADAYS, INNOVATION IN THE SCIENCE FIELD IS SURGING TO MUCH EXTENT. HENCE, THIS PROCEDURES DEMAND A PLETHORA OF ANIMALS TO BE TESTED. THERE ARE CERTAIN FOLKS WHO BELIEVE THAT USING ANIMAL FOR THE TESTING ANY NEW FORMULA OR TREATMENT IS CONSIDERED AS A DETRIMENTALMACTION BY HUMAN LIKE SELFISH. THIS ESSAY WILL COMPLETELY OPPOSE THE THE ABOVE NOTION DUE TO VARIOUS REASON WHICH IS DISCUSSED BELOW WITH RELEVENT EXAMPLE.
FIRST OF ALL, DOING EXPERIENT ON ANIMAL MAY LEAD TO ECLINE IN THE NUMBER OF WILD ANIMAL COMMUNITY THAT IS MUCH ESSENTIAL TO MAITAIN THE ECO-SYSTEM OF THE ENVIRONMENT. FOR EXAMPLE, AS PER THE USA WILD-LIFE DEPARTMENT, 80% OF THE ANIMALS SENT TO THE LABORATORY LAST YEAR FOR TESTING NEW MEDICINE. THUS, SOME ANIMALS BECAME EXTINCT. THEREFORE, IT SHOULD BE BANNED TO USE ANIMALS FOR THE TRYING PURPOSE.
SECOND OF ALL, AS HUMAN FEELS PAIN IN HURTING IN THE SAME WAY ANIMALS EXPERIENCES TOO. AND THIS KIND OF ACTIVITY SHOW THE CRUALTY TOWARD THE ANIMAL THAT IS NOT COUNTABLE WORK. FOR INSTANCE, AS PER THE VETENERY STUDY, 60% OF THE ANIMALS HAVE THE FEELING ND ATTACHMENT SAME AS HUMEN. IF WE HURT THEIR ONE OF THE FAMILY MEMBER, THEIR FAMILY GETS HURT AS WELL.
HOWEVER, SOME SCIENTFIC METHODS CAN NOT APPLY ON HUMAN OR ANY OTHER BIRDS SUCH AS TRYING NE ANTIDOTS OF THE SEVERAL SERIOUS DISEASES LIKE CANCER. AS IT HAS MAJOR ADVERS EFFECT ON PERFECTLY FIT INDIVIDUAL AND DISEASED PERSON IS UNFIT FOR USING IT BEFORE ACCURATE RESULT.
IN CONCLUSION, ANIMALS INDEED A MEDIUM FOR A HUMA TO MAKE SUCH EXPERENT SUCCESSFUL AS SCIENTIST. PERHAPS, ON E SHOULD NEVER USE THEM ABOVE THEIR LIMITS RATHER THAN FINDING A LTERNATIVE FOR SO. TO FIND THE ALTERNATVES, GOVERNMENT CAN HELP THOSE PEOPLE BY SUPPORTING THEM. THIS WAY, THERE WOULD BE NO HARM TO AN ANIMALS JUST FOR OUR SHAKE.
NOWADAYS, INNOVATION IN THE SCIENCE FIELD IS SURGING TO MUCH EXTENT.
HENCE
, THIS PROCEDURES DEMAND A PLETHORA OF
ANIMALS
TO BE
TESTED
. THERE ARE CERTAIN FOLKS WHO BELIEVE THAT USING
ANIMAL
FOR THE TESTING ANY NEW FORMULA OR TREATMENT
IS CONSIDERED
AS A
DETRIMENTALMACTION
BY HUMAN LIKE SELFISH. THIS ESSAY WILL COMPLETELY OPPOSE
THE THE
ABOVE NOTION DUE TO VARIOUS REASON WHICH
IS DISCUSSED
BELOW WITH
RELEVENT
EXAMPLE.
FIRST OF ALL
, DOING
EXPERIENT
ON
ANIMAL
MAY LEAD TO
ECLINE
IN THE NUMBER OF WILD
ANIMAL
COMMUNITY
THAT IS
MUCH ESSENTIAL TO
MAITAIN
THE ECO-SYSTEM OF THE ENVIRONMENT.
FOR EXAMPLE
, AS PER THE USA WILD-LIFE DEPARTMENT, 80% OF THE
ANIMALS
SENT
TO THE LABORATORY LAST YEAR FOR TESTING NEW MEDICINE.
THUS
,
SOME
ANIMALS
BECAME EXTINCT.
THEREFORE
, IT SHOULD
BE BANNED
TO
USE
ANIMALS
FOR THE TRYING PURPOSE.
SECOND OF ALL, AS HUMAN FEELS PAIN IN HURTING
IN THE SAME WAY
ANIMALS
EXPERIENCES TOO. AND THIS KIND OF ACTIVITY
SHOW
THE
CRUALTY
TOWARD THE
ANIMAL
THAT IS
NOT COUNTABLE WORK.
FOR INSTANCE
, AS PER THE
VETENERY
STUDY, 60% OF THE
ANIMALS
HAVE THE FEELING ND ATTACHMENT SAME AS
HUMEN
. IF WE HURT THEIR ONE OF THE FAMILY MEMBER, THEIR FAMILY
GETS
HURT
AS WELL
.
HOWEVER
,
SOME
SCIENTFIC
METHODS CAN NOT APPLY ON HUMAN OR ANY OTHER BIRDS SUCH AS TRYING NE
ANTIDOTS
OF THE SEVERAL SERIOUS DISEASES LIKE CANCER. AS IT HAS MAJOR
ADVERS
EFFECT ON
PERFECTLY
FIT INDIVIDUAL AND DISEASED PERSON IS UNFIT FOR USING IT
BEFORE
ACCURATE RESULT.
IN CONCLUSION
,
ANIMALS
INDEED
A MEDIUM FOR A
HUMA
TO
MAKE
SUCH
EXPERENT
SUCCESSFUL AS SCIENTIST. PERHAPS, ON E SHOULD NEVER
USE
THEM ABOVE THEIR LIMITS
RATHER
THAN FINDING A
LTERNATIVE
FOR
SO
. TO FIND THE
ALTERNATVES
,
GOVERNMENT
CAN
HELP
THOSE
PEOPLE
BY SUPPORTING THEM. THIS WAY, THERE WOULD BE NO HARM TO AN
ANIMALS
JUST
FOR OUR SHAKE.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes