"
The idea that working in groups is a bad thing is fundamentally mistaken because, overall, the advantages of this way of configuring the class outweigh the potential disadvantages [of this way of configuring the class]. In groups there is the opportunity for peer teaching, which can often be invaluable. In addition, lessons organised in this way become less teacher-centred. Moreover, in life today, team-working is a feature of every workplace and one of the roles of university education is to provide a preparation for students' future careers.
Firstly, peer teaching can contribute to effective learning in most classroom situations. Many students (especially in large classes) can benefit from this approach. Weaker students are often less afraid of making mistakes and taking risks in front of their peers, than in close contact with their teacher or in front of the whole class. Also, with regard to the stronger students, a perfect way to consolidate their learning is to transmit that knowledge to others. Furthermore, most pedagogic approaches today concur that a lesson that is focused on the teacher at all times, is one from which the students are unlikely to benefit. Certainly, some classroom activities, like project work for example, are best conducted in small groups. The teacher as the source of all wisdom standing at the front of the class, the 'jug and mug' model of education, is not only antiquated, but also ineffective.
A further benefit of group-teaching is the preparation it provides for working in teams. In a great variety of careers today, the employees are asked to, and are judged on their ability to work in teams. Group working in class represents basically the same concept. The same skills are being tested and developed - interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence, to mention just two. In business today, the ability to lead effectively and to support one's peers is prized almost above all other skills.
In conclusion then, while it may sometimes be true that the weak students may 'take it easy' sometimes in groups, allowing others to work hard to compensate for their laziness, if the lesson materials are interesting and the teacher motivating, this is a rare occurrence. As outlined above, there are so many 'pros' to this method of classroom configuration that these easily outweigh this somewhat questionable 'con'.
"
The
idea
that working in
groups
is a
bad
thing is
fundamentally
mistaken
because
,
overall
, the advantages of this way of configuring the
class
outweigh the potential disadvantages [of this way of configuring the
class
]. In
groups
there is the opportunity for
peer
teaching, which can
often
be invaluable.
In addition
, lessons
organised
in this way become less
teacher-centred
.
Moreover
, in life
today
, team-working is a feature of every workplace and one of the roles of university education is to provide a preparation for students' future careers.
Firstly
,
peer
teaching can contribute to effective learning in most classroom situations.
Many
students
(
especially
in large
classes)
can benefit from this approach. Weaker
students
are
often
less afraid of making mistakes and taking
risks
in front of their
peers
, than in close contact with their
teacher
or in front of the whole
class
.
Also
, with regard to the stronger
students
, a perfect way to consolidate their learning is to transmit that knowledge to others.
Furthermore
, most pedagogic approaches
today
concur that a lesson that
is focused
on the
teacher
at all times, is one from which the
students
are unlikely to benefit.
Certainly
,
some
classroom activities, like project work
for example
, are best conducted in
small
groups
. The
teacher
as the source of all wisdom standing at the front of the
class
, the 'jug and mug' model of education, is not
only
antiquated,
but
also
ineffective.
A
further
benefit of group-teaching is the preparation it provides for working in teams. In a great variety of careers
today
, the employees are
asked to
, and
are judged
on their ability to work in teams.
Group
working in
class
represents
basically
the same concept. The same
skills
are being
tested
and developed
-
interpersonal
skills
and emotional intelligence, to mention
just
two. In business
today
, the ability to lead
effectively
and to support one's
peers
is prized
almost
above all
other
skills
.
In conclusion
then, while it may
sometimes
be true that the weak
students
may 'take it easy'
sometimes
in
groups
, allowing others to work
hard
to compensate for their laziness, if the lesson materials are interesting and the
teacher
motivating, this is a rare occurrence. As outlined above, there are
so
many
'pros' to this method of classroom configuration that these
easily
outweigh this somewhat questionable 'con'.