Human beings are created as male and female to complement each other. Although it is common to see each gender has its different strengths and weaknesses, it is argued whether that reason gives the right to exclude men or women from certain professions because of their gender. I will show in this essay that should not be the case, based on the existence of exceptions for the rule and the additional advantages obtained by having different genders in a profession.
Many general rules seem to have exceptions, and the rule of “there are certain strengths for males and certain strengths for women” could be one of them. The rule may describe the majority of both genders, but there are a lot of examples of men and women who excel in professions of the other gender. The greatest chefs in the world are mostly men, and one of them is Osama Elsayed, a famous chef in the Middle East who is a passionate and creative cooker. Moreover, among the efficient politicians, we find Margaret Thatcher, the prime minister of Britain, who served the country well. So, excluding men and women from specific professions will prevent the world from having a brilliant exception.
Besides, having both genders in a profession would enrich the field. Men and women come with different strengths and backgrounds, which will provide a variety of perspectives for solving a problem or developing a solution. For instance, having a female police officer would assist in dealing with children and women abuse crimes. Therefore, it is not an efficient idea to prevent men or women from serving a specific field with their strengths.
In summary, in spite of the stereotype of what can men do and what can women do, it is beneficial to have different genders and views in a profession which would improve the results. However, we should not forget the differences and enforce men or women to do the job in a specific way. Instead, encourage both to provide the best of them.
Human beings
are created
as male and female to complement each other. Although it is common to
see
each gender has its
different
strengths
and weaknesses, it
is argued
whether that reason gives the right to exclude
men
or
women
from certain
professions
because
of their gender. I will
show
in this essay that should not be the case, based on the existence of
exceptions for
the
rule
and the additional advantages obtained by
having
different
genders in a profession.
Many
general
rules
seem to have exceptions, and the
rule
of “there are certain
strengths
for males and certain
strengths
for
women”
could be one of them. The
rule
may
describe
the majority of both genders,
but
there are
a lot of
examples of
men
and
women
who excel in
professions
of the other gender. The greatest chefs in the world are
mostly
men
, and one of them is Osama
Elsayed
, a
famous
chef in the Middle East who is a passionate and creative cooker.
Moreover
, among the efficient politicians, we find Margaret Thatcher, the prime minister of Britain, who served the country well.
So
, excluding
men
and
women
from specific
professions
will
prevent
the world from
having
a brilliant exception.
Besides
,
having
both genders in a
profession
would enrich the field.
Men
and
women
come
with
different
strengths
and backgrounds, which will provide a variety of perspectives for solving a problem or developing a solution.
For instance
,
having
a female police officer would assist in dealing with children and
women
abuse crimes.
Therefore
, it is not an efficient
idea
to
prevent
men
or
women
from serving a specific field with their strengths.
In summary,
in spite of
the stereotype of what can
men
do and what can
women
do, it is beneficial to have
different
genders and views in a
profession
which would
improve
the results.
However
, we should not forget the differences and enforce
men
or
women
to do the job
in a specific way
.
Instead
, encourage both to provide the best of them.