It is commonly thought that a new employee should be offered a job based on his personal qualities rather than academic achievements. I completely disagree with this belief as I think that person's qualification and experience outweigh his personal qualities. In this essay I will offer supportive statements that are ground of my disagreement.
To begin with, I believe that individual’s education is a hard-earned asset, it should be given more priority as compared to any other quality. After all, his qualification and experience makes him proficient to achieve tasks and thus benefit the company. In addition, it is the academic achievements and real life experiences that makes the individual’s identity. Also, it is a matter of fact that a person that holds engineering degree would handle the development projects in a better way than a person having good nature or better personal qualities.
Another reason that compels me to disagree with thought to give more advantage to personal qualities is that, the qualities that we could learn by our own experience could not be gained by any other way. For example, it takes years of experience to become a good leader or a better team player. Thus, it is beneficial for the organization to look for qualification of an interviewer rather than his personal qualities.
As per my opinion, a person could borrow a personal quality, however the academic qualities such as education and experience could not be borrowed by anyone. These educational qualities would benefit the organization not the personal qualities. Hence such qualities should be given more preference over personal qualities.
In conclusion, qualification of a person holds more value than his personal qualities and I disagree with giving high priority to personal qualities while selecting a candidate for a job. Personal qualities do not make a person productive or competent for job. On the other side educational qualification and work experience provide him the qualities of leadership and team management skills.
It is
commonly
thought
that a new employee should
be offered
a job based on his
personal
qualities
rather
than academic achievements. I completely disagree with this belief as I
think
that person's
qualification
and
experience
outweigh his
personal
qualities
. In this essay I will offer supportive statements that
are ground
of my disagreement.
To
begin
with, I believe that individual’s education is a
hard
-earned asset, it should be
given
more priority as compared to any other
quality
.
After all
, his
qualification
and
experience
makes
him proficient to achieve tasks and
thus
benefit the
company
.
In addition
, it is the academic achievements and real life
experiences
that
makes
the individual’s identity.
Also
, it is a matter of fact that a
person
that holds engineering degree would handle the development projects in a better way than a
person
having
good
nature or better
personal
qualities.
Another reason that compels me to disagree with
thought
to give more advantage to
personal
qualities
is that, the
qualities
that we could learn by our
own
experience
could not
be gained
by any other way.
For example
, it takes years of
experience
to become a
good
leader or a better team player.
Thus
, it is beneficial for the organization to look for
qualification
of an interviewer
rather
than his
personal
qualities.
As per my opinion, a
person
could borrow a
personal
quality
,
however
the academic
qualities
such as education and
experience
could not
be borrowed
by anyone. These educational
qualities
would benefit the organization not the
personal
qualities
.
Hence
such
qualities
should be
given
more preference over
personal
qualities.
In conclusion
,
qualification
of a
person
holds more value than his
personal
qualities
and I disagree with giving high priority to
personal
qualities
while selecting a candidate for a job.
Personal
qualities
do not
make
a
person
productive or competent for job. On the other side educational
qualification
and work
experience
provide him the
qualities
of leadership and team management
skills
.