Which one do you think has the greatest impact on protecting the environment? Government regulation, organizations, or individual efforts. v.2
Which one do you think has the greatest impact on protecting the environment? Government regulation, organizations, or individual efforts. v. 2
It is no doubt that nowadays people put more emphasis on protecting the environment. However, we don’t have an agreement regarding who should lead people to protect the environment. Should the government set it a rule requiring people to follow certain rules? Do organizations or individual efforts provide a better result? From my perspective, the government has the greatest impact on protecting the environment.
In the first place, only government is able to provide facilities necessary for protecting the environment. With the proper facility, it is possible for people to change their original behave. For example, twenty years ago, our mayor began to set up beautiful recycle bins in every park and encouraged people to reduce the amount of the garbage by recycling them in those bins. People found them interesting so soon after the bins were set, recycle became a well-adapted concept. Nevertheless, organizations and individual efforts do not have the power to provide and set the facilities. As a result, they do not make impacts like the government does.
In addition, only government has the power to provide various educational programs to the public regarding protecting the environment. To be more specific, the government can ask schools to teach kids about protecting the earth. Also, it can increase the awareness of protecting the environment by posting notices on TV or on road signs. In contrast, although organizations can also provide educational programs, they have limited resources and outreach to thrive their programs. Not to mention, an individual is not capable of conducting big educational projects. Consequently, the government makes the greatest impact because it is able to provide numerous educational programs to a wide range of people.
Last but not least, the government has the authority to make it a rule and force people to follow the rules. For example, to reduce the amount of plastic bags which harm the environment, our government prohibits stores from giving free plastic bags. People have to pay to get the plastic bags. Furthermore, if anyone breaks the law, the person will be fined with a big penalty. The policy works well and many people bring their fabric bags to shop now. However, organizations and individuals have no such authority to influence people.
In conclusion, I believe the government has the greatest power to influence people to protect the environment. It is able to provide necessary facilities and education to the public in order to increase the awareness. Moreover, it owns the power to force people to follow the policy to protect the Earth. Neither organization nor individual can achieve them.
It is no doubt that nowadays
people
put more emphasis on
protecting
the
environment
.
However
, we don’t have an agreement regarding who should lead
people
to protect the
environment
. Should the
government
set it a
rule
requiring
people
to follow certain
rules
? Do
organizations
or
individual
efforts
provide
a better result? From my perspective, the
government
has the greatest impact on
protecting
the environment.
In the
first
place,
only
government
is able to
provide
facilities necessary for
protecting
the
environment
. With the proper facility, it is possible for
people
to
change
their original behave.
For example
, twenty years ago, our mayor began to set up
beautiful
recycle bins in every park and encouraged
people
to
reduce
the amount of the garbage by recycling them in those bins.
People
found them interesting
so
soon
after the bins
were set
, recycle became a well-adapted concept.
Nevertheless
,
organizations
and
individual
efforts do not have the
power
to
provide
and set the facilities.
As a result
, they do not
make
impacts like the
government
does.
In addition
,
only
government
has the
power
to
provide
various
educational
programs
to the public regarding
protecting
the
environment
. To be more specific, the
government
can ask schools to teach kids about
protecting
the earth.
Also
, it can increase the awareness of
protecting
the
environment
by posting notices on TV or on road signs.
In contrast
, although
organizations
can
also
provide
educational
programs
, they have limited resources and outreach to thrive their
programs
. Not to mention, an
individual
is not capable of conducting
big
educational
projects.
Consequently
, the
government
makes
the greatest impact
because
it is able to
provide
numerous
educational
programs
to a wide range of
people
.
Last
but
not least, the
government
has the authority to
make
it a
rule
and force
people
to follow the
rules
.
For example
, to
reduce
the amount of plastic
bags
which harm the
environment
, our
government
prohibits stores from giving free plastic
bags
.
People
have to
pay to
get
the plastic
bags
.
Furthermore
, if anyone breaks the law, the person will be
fined
with a
big
penalty. The policy works well and
many
people
bring their fabric
bags
to shop
now
.
However
,
organizations
and
individuals
have no such authority to influence
people
.
In conclusion
, I believe the
government
has the greatest
power
to influence
people
to protect the
environment
. It is able to
provide
necessary facilities and education to the public in order to increase the awareness.
Moreover
, it
owns
the
power
to force
people
to follow the policy to protect the Earth. Neither
organization
nor
individual
can achieve them.
15Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
71Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes