< span style=" font-size: 19. 36px; " > With 5G coming, more and more people get connected on the internet. The netizens leave comments on controversial topics, share moments on social media, contribute knowledge to Wikipedia. The Internet has done a huge influence on human daily life, including how to get the needed information. For me, the Internet is an ideal way to acquire knowledge rather than books. I will support my point from three aspects: diversity, spread speed, and efficiency of fixing mistakes.
On one hand, the Internet always offers much more information than books do. The reason is quite simple: space is not an issue online but has a profound influence on the content of books. We all know that there is limited space in those printed and bound books, so writers and editors need to make decisions for readers what comes into books and what does not. This might reduce diversity in the taste of readers by some means. By contrast, when it comes to the online platform, everyone could contribute to the edition and share their own and specific knowledge, leading to the fact from various voices. This kind of information could only be found online but never goes into printed books.
On the other hand, the world changes rapidly, and such changes, even if we choose to report them to the public by the fastest newspapers or magazines, spread much more quickly on the internet. Let us take the Oscar awards ceremony as a good example. Even though we are in China, we could immediately know who wins the best actor, which movie comes out to be the best international movie and so on via the internet. No one is expecting to get such news from the newspapers until the next day since it is too late.
Many people who refuse to refer to internet claim that there are amounts of rumors and inaccurate response. However, it is hardly ensured that books never contain errors and typos. It is not how many errors are contained, but how fast such mistakes can be corrected or eliminated that matters. For those printed and bound books, it would not be modified till next re-edition, while inaccurate messages could be rapidly noticed by the monitors and be corrected or erased.
Hence, I would say the internet is an ideal place to find whatever you need more exhaustively, rapidly, and accurately. < /span> < br>
<
; span style=
"
; font-size: 19. 36px;
"
;
>
; With 5G coming, more and more
people
get
connected on the internet. The netizens
leave
comments on controversial topics, share moments on social media, contribute knowledge to Wikipedia. The Internet has done a huge influence on human daily life, including how to
get
the needed information. For me, the Internet is an ideal way to acquire knowledge
rather
than
books
. I will support my point from three aspects: diversity, spread speed, and efficiency of fixing mistakes.
On one hand, the Internet always offers much more information than
books
do. The reason is quite simple: space is not an issue online
but
has a profound influence on the content of
books
. We all know that there
is limited
space in those printed and bound
books
,
so
writers and editors need to
make
decisions for readers what
comes
into
books
and what does not. This might
reduce
diversity in the taste of readers by
some
means. By contrast, when it
comes
to the online platform, everyone could contribute to the edition and share their
own
and specific knowledge, leading to the fact from various voices. This kind of information could
only
be found
online
but
never goes into printed books.
On the other hand
, the world
changes
rapidly
, and such
changes
, even if we choose to report them to the public by the fastest newspapers or magazines, spread much more
quickly
on the internet.
Let
us take the Oscar awards ceremony as a
good
example.
Even though
we are in China, we could immediately know who wins the best actor, which movie
comes
out to be the best international movie and
so
on via the internet. No one is expecting to
get
such news from the newspapers until the
next
day since it is too late.
Many
people
who refuse to refer to internet claim that there are amounts of rumors and inaccurate response.
However
, it is hardly ensured that
books
never contain errors and typos. It is not how
many
errors
are contained
,
but
how
fast
such mistakes can
be corrected
or eliminated that matters. For those printed and bound
books
, it would not
be modified
till
next
re-edition, while inaccurate messages could be
rapidly
noticed by the monitors and
be corrected
or erased.
Hence
, I would say the internet is an ideal place to find whatever you need more
exhaustively
,
rapidly
, and
accurately
.
<
; /
span>
;
<
;
br>
;