In a technologically advanced nation, the old-fashioned skills and conventional lifestyle are becoming extinct and it is needless to save them. I agree to a great extend to this view because we are able to save more time and effort as well be accurate enough, however on the other hand, some jobs still require ancestral skills.
First of all, modern-innovative technologies have made it possible to reduce considerable amount of time and effort. There are automated machines available in the market which most of the companies prefer to complete their work on time. Besides, these machines require few man power and the work can be done effectively and efficiently. For instance, automated devices can sew thousands of clothes in a day as compared to manual labour. Hence, modern advanced technology requires less effort and time.
Furthermore, these devices are accurate every time we use. There is no chance of human-error while using these modern equipments. For example, if a bank wants to compute the turnover of the entire decade, it would be easily possible with the use of software to get the exact value. Moreover, by using traditional methods to apply the complex algorithm manually it could be error prone without the use of machines. Thus, it is clear how precise these ultra-modern machines could be.
Conversely, there are some specific jobs which still require traditional expertise. It would not be possible without the help of subject knowledge to complete the job. To illustrate, in the agricultural sector, we need to rely more on the farmers' traditional skills, techniques and knowledge yield the best quality crop. Therefore, it is vital for some jobs to depend on traditional methods.
To conclude, in a technologically developed nation, the traditional methods and lifestyles will phase out and it is senseless to revive them. In this case, I recommend the lawmakers to focus on the job generation to ensure that not all jobs are being taken by machines.
In a
technologically
advanced nation, the
old
-fashioned
skills
and conventional lifestyle are becoming extinct and it is needless to save them. I
agree
to a great
extend
to this view
because
we are able to save more
time
and effort
as well
be accurate
enough
,
however
on the other hand
,
some
jobs
still
require
ancestral
skills
.
First of all
, modern-innovative technologies have made it possible to
reduce
considerable amount of
time
and effort. There
are automated
machines
available in the market which most of the
companies
prefer to complete their work on
time
.
Besides
, these
machines
require
few
man
power and the work can
be done
effectively
and
efficiently
.
For instance
, automated devices can sew thousands of clothes in a day as compared to manual
labour
.
Hence
, modern advanced technology
requires
less effort and time.
Furthermore
, these devices are accurate every
time
we
use
. There is no chance of human-error while using these modern equipments.
For example
, if a bank wants to compute the turnover of the entire decade, it would be
easily
possible with the
use
of software to
get
the exact value.
Moreover
, by using
traditional
methods to apply the complex algorithm
manually
it could be error prone without the
use
of
machines
.
Thus
, it is
clear
how precise these ultra-modern
machines
could be.
Conversely
, there are
some
specific
jobs
which
still
require
traditional
expertise. It would not be possible without the
help
of subject knowledge to complete the
job
. To illustrate, in the agricultural sector, we need to rely more on the farmers'
traditional
skills
, techniques and knowledge yield the best quality crop.
Therefore
, it is vital for
some
jobs
to depend on
traditional
methods.
To conclude
, in a
technologically
developed nation, the
traditional
methods and lifestyles will phase out and it is senseless to revive them.
In this case
, I recommend the lawmakers to focus on the
job
generation to ensure that not all
jobs
are
being taken
by
machines
.