Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic. When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? v.1
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic. When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. with this opinion? v. 1
Overall, I disagree with the opinion expressed, I would like to begin by pointing out that
Traditional skills and ways of life do not automatically die due to development in technology.
In many ways, the history of civilisation is the history of technology, from the discovery of fire to the invention of the wheel to the development of the Internet we have been moving forward in the way of doing things. Some technologies, such as weapons of mass destruction, are of negative impact. Others, such as medical advances, positively help people to live better or longer, and so very much help traditional ways of life. There will be people who want to preserve their traditions even with the development of technology.
Interestingly, technology can positively contribute to the keeping alive of traditional
Skills and ways of life. For example, at places where the population is small leads to children not getting schooling. To avoid the children moving to mainland the government sets up schooling through the internet so that the children are not separated from their parents. In addition, the Internet, and modern refrigeration techniques, are being used to keep alive the traditional skills of producing salmon; it can now be ordered from, and
delivered to, anywhere in the world.
In conclusion, without suggesting that all technology is necessarily good, it does not destroy the traditional way of life, in any way, to try to keep traditions alive with technology. We should not ignore technology, because it can support us in many ways.
Overall
, I disagree with the opinion expressed, I would like to
begin
by pointing out that
Traditional
skills
and
ways
of
life
do not
automatically
die
due to development in technology.
In
many
ways
, the history of
civilisation
is the history of
technology
, from the discovery of fire to the invention of the wheel to the development of the Internet we have been moving forward in the
way
of doing things.
Some
technologies
, such as weapons of mass destruction, are of
negative
impact. Others, such as medical advances,
positively
help
people
to
live
better or longer, and
so
very
much
help
traditional
ways
of
life
. There will be
people
who want to preserve their traditions even with the development of technology.
Interestingly
,
technology
can
positively
contribute to the keeping alive of traditional
Skills
and
ways
of
life
.
For example
, at places where the population is
small
leads to children not getting schooling. To avoid the children moving to mainland the
government
sets up schooling through the internet
so
that the children are not separated from their parents.
In addition
, the Internet, and modern refrigeration techniques, are being
used
to
keep
alive the traditional
skills
of producing salmon; it can
now
be ordered
from,
and
delivered
to, anywhere in the world.
In conclusion
, without suggesting that all
technology
is
necessarily
good
, it does not
destroy
the traditional
way
of
life
, in any
way
, to try to
keep
traditions alive with
technology
. We should not
ignore
technology
,
because
it can support us in
many
ways
.
4Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
18Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes