Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? v.19

When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. with this opinion? v. 19
Technology today has evolved so much that it has had a huge impact on traditional ways of living and working in every nation. Some old fashioned jobs and practices are already extinct and few people opine that it is not worth to put effort to save those old fashion way for the sack of saving culture. However, some do not believe in this notion and they are in support to fight for cultural preservation. I firmly agree with the first notion that, if new and enhanced ways work better than we must not drag conventional methods. To embark with, proliferation in technology has changed the whole world and the way we work, we eat, we travel, we communicate and many more. The industrial evolution brought a myriad of advantages. For example, earlier jobs performed by 100 men are done by machines and only one person is required to perform operations and maintenance. Consequently, companies have started making huge profit as machines do not get tired or doesn’t get sick. In addition, due to such revolution, we receive things faster and with easy access which brings huge lifestyle change. In addition, technology is not the replacement of complete culture, technologies cannot touch the few classic essence of culture. For example, although Japan widely uses and develops various technologies, it is still rich and well known in the world for their culture. According to a survey conducted recently, the results were breathtaking, during 1970-2000, seventy five percent people who were working in un-skilled job lost their bread and butter. Furthermore, there were more than thirty million jobs were created for skilled worker, which forced un-skilled people to learn and move to skilled job. To put this in a nutshell, I pen down, saying that, technology is not a threat to culture, but it works to upgrade it and uplift people’s lifestyle. There is no point to making the extra effort to preserve the jobs which are bound to vanish by the time.
Technology
today
has evolved
so
much that it has had a huge impact on traditional
ways
of living and working in every nation.
Some
old fashioned
jobs
and practices are already extinct and few
people
opine that it is not worth to put effort to save those
old
fashion
way
for the sack of saving
culture
.
However
,
some
do not believe in this
notion and
they are in support to fight for cultural preservation. I
firmly
agree
with the
first
notion that, if new and enhanced
ways
work better than we
must
not drag conventional methods.

To embark with, proliferation in
technology
has
changed
the whole world and the
way
we work, we eat, we travel, we communicate and
many
more. The industrial evolution brought a myriad of advantages.
For example
, earlier
jobs
performed by 100
men
are done
by machines and
only
one person
is required
to perform operations and maintenance.
Consequently
,
companies
have
started
making huge profit as machines do not
get
tired or doesn’t
get
sick.
In addition
, due to such revolution, we receive things faster and with easy access which brings huge lifestyle
change
.

In addition
,
technology
is not the replacement of complete
culture
,
technologies
cannot touch the few classic essence of
culture
.
For example
, although Japan
widely
uses
and develops various
technologies
, it is
still
rich and well known in the world for their
culture
. According to a survey conducted recently, the results were breathtaking, during 1970-2000,
seventy five
percent
people
who were working in
un-skilled
job
lost their bread and butter.
Furthermore
, there were more than thirty million
jobs
were created
for skilled worker, which forced
un-skilled
people
to learn and
move
to skilled job.

To put this in a nutshell, I pen down, saying that,
technology
is not a threat to
culture
,
but
it works to upgrade it and uplift
people’s
lifestyle. There is no point to making the extra effort to preserve the
jobs
which
are bound
to vanish by the time.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes

IELTS essay When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. with this opinion? v. 19

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
330 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts