These days many people chose to live alone, especially in metropolitan areas and this rate is far higher in developed countries and seems like this has become quite normal there. I believe this trend has more negative consequences than the few positive outcomes it offers.
The single-person family is seen to be positive from better personal skill development and economic perspective. A single-member family forces a person to learn some basic skills including cooking, cleaning the house, paying the utility bills, managing personal finance, purchasing daily commodities, adopting hobbies and many more important skills. This makes someone self-dependent which has a greater impact on the development of the country in a broader sense. For instance, research shows that students who stay away from home for their tertiary degrees learn more skills and become more self-dependent than pupils who study from home. Moreover, a single-person family member is bound to do a job, business or have some sort of arrangement for a steady earning and this trend has a great positive impact on a country’s economy.
From the opposite viewpoint, the trend of increasing single-person family has many negative consequences. Firstly, the increasing trend of living alone has a direct relationship on the percentage of people suffer from psychological problems these days. Living alone creates loneliness and depression, unlike the traditional family where there are always others to share someone’s distress and sadness. The isolation often leads people to choose a lifestyle that is often negative. A recent study reveals that single-person family members often rely on drugs and many of them become addicted. The human is a social being and living alone is against their natural tendency. For many, bearing the total expenses is tough and this leads them to get involved in crimes.
In conclusion, the number of single-person families is increasing these days and this has some positive aspects despite many severe negative consequences.
These days
many
people
chose to
live
alone
,
especially
in metropolitan areas and this rate is far higher in
developed countries
and seems like this has become quite normal there. I believe this
trend
has more
negative
consequences than
the few
positive
outcomes it offers.
The single-person
family
is
seen
to be
positive
from better personal
skill
development and economic perspective. A single-member
family
forces a person to learn
some
basic
skills
including cooking, cleaning the
house
, paying the utility bills, managing personal finance, purchasing daily commodities, adopting hobbies and
many
more
important
skills
. This
makes
someone self-dependent which has a greater impact on the development of the country in a broader sense.
For instance
, research
shows
that students who stay away from home for their tertiary degrees learn more
skills
and become more self-dependent than pupils who study from home.
Moreover
, a single-person
family
member
is bound
to do a job, business or have
some
sort of arrangement for a steady earning and this
trend
has a great
positive
impact on a country’s economy.
From the opposite viewpoint, the
trend
of increasing single-person
family
has
many
negative
consequences.
Firstly
, the increasing
trend
of living
alone
has a direct relationship on the percentage of
people
suffer from psychological problems these days. Living
alone
creates loneliness and depression, unlike the traditional
family
where there are always others to share someone’s distress and sadness. The isolation
often
leads
people
to choose a lifestyle
that is
often
negative
. A recent study reveals that single-person
family
members
often
rely on drugs and
many
of them become addicted. The human is a social being and living
alone
is against their natural tendency. For
many
, bearing the total expenses is tough and this leads them to
get
involved in crimes.
In conclusion
, the number of single-person
families
is increasing these days and this has
some
positive
aspects despite
many
severe
negative
consequences.