Higher escapees should be adopted by rich nations and furnish them basic necessities like shelter and meals. This essay totally agrees with the idea because displaced persons can be absorbed as cheaper workforce and helps in improving state’s status in the global market.
Developed countries could sack the refugees as a reasonable labour by putting them in factories, big plants and mining caves. In many affluent nations, it is difficult to find labour at low cost and natives usually charge great for even a small work, therefore fugitives could be employed as a daily wage workforce at less pay. Well developed countries where youth population is very less, they can be taken as cheap labour which help economy to boost & overall help in maintaining development. For example, every year, Germany and Canada accepts a number of refugees to balance the growth of their country.
Accommodating escapees could benefit a well – heeled nation by enhancing its reputation in the global market and the local people would learn about their new culture. Migrants play a fundamental role in bringing international trade and investment becoming mediators between the states. Worldwide the nation would recognise its share and status because of a rise in business. Additionally, escapees could bring in their culture and natives would have an opportunity to understand and learn something about a new culture and broadens their horizons. For example, In the United States of America, while migrants are 15 % of the population, they represent 25 % of entrepreneurs.
In conclusion, recognising larger expatriates is has always be a win-win situation for the receiving country by furnishing them day to day needs, including home and eatables because they can be available as a low rate workman for a manufacturer and further beneficial to intensify the nation’s image in the global market by international trade and cultural exchange.
Higher escapees should
be adopted
by rich
nations
and furnish them
basic necessities
like shelter and meals. This essay
totally
agrees
with the
idea
because
displaced persons can
be absorbed
as cheaper workforce and
helps
in improving state’s status in the global market.
Developed countries
could sack the refugees as a reasonable
labour
by putting them in factories,
big
plants and mining caves. In
many
affluent
nations
, it is difficult to find
labour
at low cost and natives
usually
charge great for even a
small
work,
therefore
fugitives could
be employed
as a daily wage workforce at less pay. Well
developed countries
where youth population is
very
less, they can
be taken
as
cheap
labour
which
help
economy to boost &
overall
help
in maintaining development.
For example
, every year, Germany and Canada accepts a number of refugees to balance the growth of their country.
Accommodating escapees could benefit a well
–
heeled
nation
by enhancing its reputation in the global market and the local
people
would learn about their new culture. Migrants play a fundamental role in bringing international trade and investment becoming mediators between the states. Worldwide the
nation
would
recognise
its share and status
because
of a rise in business.
Additionally
, escapees could bring in their culture and natives would have an opportunity to understand and learn something about a new culture and broadens their horizons.
For example
, In the United States of America, while migrants are 15 % of the population, they represent 25 % of entrepreneurs.
In conclusion
,
recognising
larger expatriates is has always
be
a win-win situation for the receiving country by furnishing them day to day needs, including home and eatables
because
they can be available as a low rate workman for a manufacturer and
further
beneficial to intensify the
nation’s
image in the global market by international trade and cultural exchange.