An upsurge figure of crime has dramatically changed our legal system over the period of time. In fact, stricter rules are applied, especially, to the task force who are patrolling on the roads and public areas. In my opinion, this is one of the ways to cope up criminal activities within the surroundings. However, there are several other options for educating and guiding right pathways to divert criminals into productive direction.
On the one hand, when people see more police officers in public areas, some think much safer than those who feel something is not right, which is why they get confused and questions why so many guards around. Certainly, this sense of awareness will triggers a bell for the smaller criminals who are involved in robbery, snatching, pick-pocketing and other misbehaviours. Hence, increasing number of constables and officers on the street is an effective way of diminishing small to medium scale crimes in the locality.
Having said that policemen are efficient in controlling mis-happenings to some extent, but situations related to human trafficking, cybercrime and some sexual assaults are still remains unanswerable. In the given condition, even if the government improvises ground force on the field, probability of crime doesn't affect at all. Because all these activities won't have any major influence on criminals in performing those misdeeds. Consequently, developing other strategies which support overall growth of educated population in the nation for instance, establishing rehab centres, psychological education courses for offenders and applying stringent laws of heavy fines and imprisonment are few of them.
In view of the discussions outlined above, it can be recapitulated that no matter how many officers are on duty in the street if we have the disciplined citizens in the country, the crime rate will downsize automatically. So, it is better to have people who are self-aware and proactive instead of more are border force to control them.
An upsurge figure of
crime
has
dramatically
changed
our legal system over the period of time. In fact, stricter
rules
are applied
,
especially
, to the task force
who
are patrolling on the roads and public areas. In my opinion, this is one of the ways to cope up
criminal
activities within the surroundings.
However
, there are several other options for educating and guiding right pathways to divert
criminals
into productive direction.
On the one hand, when
people
see
more police officers in public areas,
some
think
much safer than those
who
feel something is not right, which is why they
get
confused and questions why
so
many
guards around.
Certainly
, this sense of awareness will
triggers
a bell for the smaller
criminals
who
are involved
in robbery, snatching, pick-pocketing and other
misbehaviours
.
Hence
, increasing number of constables and officers on the street is an effective way of diminishing
small
to medium scale
crimes
in the locality.
Having said that policemen are efficient in controlling
mis-happenings
to
some
extent,
but
situations related to human trafficking, cybercrime and
some
sexual assaults are
still
remains unanswerable. In the
given
condition, even if the
government
improvises ground force on the field, probability of
crime
doesn't
affect
at all.
Because
all these activities won't have any major influence on
criminals
in performing those misdeeds.
Consequently
, developing other strategies which support
overall
growth of educated population in the nation
for instance
, establishing rehab
centres
, psychological education courses for offenders and applying stringent laws of heavy fines and imprisonment are few of them.
In view of the discussions outlined above, it can
be recapitulated
that no matter how
many
officers are on duty in the street if we have the disciplined citizens in the country, the
crime
rate will downsize
automatically
.
So
, it is better to have
people
who
are self-aware and proactive
instead
of more are border force to control them.