In the world of juxtaposed nations, several countries will benefit from international cooperation. Global support has been considered to be the only solution to most of urgent problems. This essay will discuss why I moderately agree with this proposition with argument against its sole responsibility in some kinds of problem.
To begin with, cooperation on global scales helps a certain country to effectively solve its urgent matter. For example, global warming remains a heated environmental issue because of its potentially disastrous consequences. This phenomenon can be caused huge amount of carbon dioxide, hence it is essential that international actions should be called soon. In addition, radioactive sources will spread in nuclear radiation accidents. Although it may be seen as a locally affected problem, global attention should be encouraged. But would all immediate problems be solved only by global joint actions?
However, some kinds of urgent matters can not only be solved by intercontinental cooperation but also by nationwide measures. Specifically, educational issues do not require actions from other countries. If government cannot solve internal problems like building sustainable educational system, they will lose their citizen’s belief, let alone managing country. Similarly, national authorities should not let structural corruption be intervened by foreign organizations for the sake of national security. As a result, some corporations make use of international cooperation to damage citizen’s patriotism.
To conclude, this essay argued while most of immediate matters can be only tackled on global scales, some urgent problems should first be solved by their own government. In my opinion, I moderately agree with this proposition as not all such problems need worldwide actions.
In the world of juxtaposed nations, several
countries
will benefit from international
cooperation
.
Global
support has
been considered
to be the
only
solution to most of
urgent
problems
. This essay will discuss why I
moderately
agree
with this proposition with argument against its sole responsibility in
some
kinds of problem.
To
begin
with,
cooperation
on
global
scales
helps
a certain
country
to
effectively
solve its
urgent
matter.
For example
,
global
warming remains a heated environmental issue
because
of its
potentially
disastrous consequences. This phenomenon can
be caused
huge amount of carbon dioxide,
hence
it is essential that international actions should
be called
soon
.
In addition
, radioactive sources will spread in nuclear radiation accidents. Although it may be
seen
as a
locally
affected
problem
,
global
attention should
be encouraged
.
But
would all immediate
problems
be solved
only
by
global
joint actions?
However
,
some
kinds of
urgent
matters can not
only
be solved
by intercontinental
cooperation
but
also
by nationwide measures.
Specifically
, educational issues do not require actions from other
countries
. If
government
cannot solve internal
problems
like building sustainable educational system, they will lose their citizen’s belief,
let
alone managing
country
.
Similarly
, national authorities should not
let
structural corruption
be intervened
by foreign organizations for the sake of national security.
As a result
,
some
corporations
make
use
of international
cooperation
to damage citizen’s patriotism.
To conclude
, this essay argued while most of immediate matters can be
only
tackled on
global
scales,
some
urgent
problems
should
first
be solved
by their
own
government
. In my opinion, I
moderately
agree
with this proposition as not all such
problems
need worldwide actions.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes