Choosing good programs to teach at school is one of the issues that most of the experts encounter with it. Some of them believe that students should take in knowledge related to work and it is necessary to reduce the number of programs related to academic knowledge. I completely disagree with the given statement on the basis of connection between academic and business and progression of next generation sciences
To begin with, the main reason behind is that business has always been in correlation with academic knowledge. This means that students acquire these sorts of knowledge, which they do not think it can be utilized in career. For instance, Some of the computer scientists employ mathematic formulation on their vocation that acquire them at school. Thus, such correlations are not obvious at first by students, but they can utterly useful one day.
Having said that, however, the correlation is not only main factor in this respect. Another argument is that most of the jobs are related to new technologies. Students should have a background about this knowledge from school programs. Science is in progress and new technologies are invented by academic base knowledge. For example, there if students learn fundamental information about space at the school, they will be more successful in the profession that if have a job at NASA. So, under no circumstances should we deny the role of academic base knowledge at schools on progressing of next generation sciences.
To conclude, I personally take the view that it is unacceptable to leave well-rounded education to students at schools. this is mainly because a various array of jobs depend on academic knowledge in addition developing of new technologies. It would be highly recommended that school authorities invite some professional scientists to school to describe significant importance of knowledge in the work.
Choosing
good
programs to teach at
school
is one of the issues that most of the experts encounter with it.
Some
of them believe that
students
should take in
knowledge
related to work and it is necessary to
reduce
the number of programs related to
academic
knowledge
. I completely disagree with the
given
statement on the basis of
connection between
academic
and business and progression of
next
generation sciences
To
begin
with, the main reason behind is that business has always been in correlation with
academic
knowledge
. This means that
students
acquire these sorts of
knowledge
, which they do not
think
it can
be utilized
in career.
For instance
,
Some of the
computer scientists employ mathematic formulation on their vocation that acquire them at
school
.
Thus
, such correlations are not obvious at
first
by
students
,
but
they can
utterly
useful one day.
Having said that,
however
, the correlation is not
only
main factor in this respect. Another argument is that most of the jobs
are related
to new technologies.
Students
should have a background about this
knowledge
from
school
programs. Science is in progress and new technologies
are invented
by
academic
base
knowledge
.
For example
, there if
students
learn fundamental information about space at the
school
, they will be more successful in the profession
that if have
a job at NASA.
So
, under no circumstances should we deny the role of
academic
base
knowledge
at
schools
on progressing of
next
generation sciences.
To conclude
, I
personally
take the view that it is unacceptable to
leave
well-rounded education to
students
at
schools
.
this
is
mainly
because
a various array of jobs
depend
on
academic
knowledge
in addition
developing of new technologies. It would be
highly
recommended that
school
authorities invite
some
professional scientists to
school
to
describe
significant importance of
knowledge
in the work.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes