Some people think that protecting animals and birds is excessively attracting concern and resources of society. Personally, I would argue that although much attention and a large budget are given, the protection of wild species is worth being focused on.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people are paying much attention and allocate many resources to protect wildlife. First, many non-governmental organizations have been globally established, the vision of which is to guarantee the survival of wild animals and birds. This undoubtedly attracts a great deal of social attention via a variety of their programmes. For example, The WildAid Campaign whose aim is to protect endangered species has drawn incredible community’s attention by appointing the football star David Beckham as its lead ambassador. Second, being globally conducted, some protection programmes could cost a huge amount of money to build infrastructure or carry out researches. If they are not allocated budget enough, their aims are hardly achieved.
However, I believe that the current social concern and budget are really necessary because of the importance of nature. The first reason is that protecting wild animals and birds would maintain the balance of the ecosystem, which ensures the survival of various creatures on the earth, and the human race is of no exception. If just only a few species became extinct, the ecosystem would be disturbed, threatening the existence of a vast number of other species. Additionally, because natural habitats are really crucial for human life, preserving the habitats to protect the wildlife significantly benefits human. For instance, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb CO2 and stabilize the earth climate.
In conclusion, while much concern and many resources are focused on the protection of wild animals and birds, these creatures deserve to be protected because of their vital role in human’s life.
Some
people
think
that protecting
animals
and
birds
is
excessively
attracting concern and resources of society.
Personally
, I would argue that although much
attention
and a large budget are
given
, the protection of wild species is worth
being focused
on.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why
people
are paying much
attention
and allocate
many
resources to protect wildlife.
First
,
many
non-governmental organizations have been globally established, the vision of which is to guarantee the survival of wild
animals
and
birds
. This
undoubtedly
attracts a great deal of social
attention
via a variety of their
programmes
.
For example
, The
WildAid
Campaign whose aim is to protect endangered species has drawn incredible community’s
attention
by appointing the football star David Beckham as its lead ambassador. Second, being globally conducted,
some
protection
programmes
could cost a huge amount of money to build infrastructure or carry out researches. If they are not allocated budget
enough
, their aims are hardly achieved.
However
, I believe that the
current
social concern and budget are
really
necessary
because
of the importance of nature. The
first
reason is that protecting wild
animals
and
birds
would maintain the balance of the ecosystem, which ensures the survival of various creatures on the earth, and the
human
race is of no exception. If
just
only
a few species became extinct, the ecosystem would
be disturbed
, threatening the existence of a vast number of other species.
Additionally
,
because
natural habitats are
really
crucial for
human
life, preserving the habitats to protect the wildlife
significantly
benefits
human
.
For instance
, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb CO2 and stabilize the earth climate.
In conclusion
, while much concern and
many
resources
are focused
on the protection of wild
animals
and
birds
, these creatures deserve to
be protected
because
of their vital role in
human’s
life.