We all need food to survive. It is thought that with the domination of cutting-edge technology, such as airplane, food is accessible to everywhere while others see it as a danger, rather than a boon. I totally support the mobile trend in food distribution.
First of all, opponents of this tendency argue that the spread of food to far-away places is cost-ineffective. Such fees related to gasoline, transportation delivery, staff management and other types of insurance are way beyond the pocket of suppliers. However, economically, it bestows upon both producers and consumers more noticeable benefits. Due to scarcity of food in some areas, as a result of frozen or extremely scorching weather, crop failures are predictable, leading to a skyrocketing price. Hence, with the in-time delivery from other zones which are available in this type of needed food, the prices can be curbed and their taste is fully satisfied while businessmen who truly prioritize the demand of customers over others gain a huge amount of profit. Besides, as living standards of human escalates non-stop, their need for varied food, from eastern to western, is more urgent than ever, especially in times of globalization. As there goes a saying “variety is the spice of life”, food transported from thousands of miles away from its farm is inevitable.
The second disadvantage of this trend is believed to trigger the inability to control the quality of food and growing dependence of each nation. The past has shown that Roman, as a consequence of relying on food chain supply of other nations, ever saw its power going into steep decline whereas the task of far-distance distribution can hardly ensure the thorough examination between suppliers and buyers, and trigger unwanted virus damaging the food. Nevertheless, gone are the days that food was easily ruined by external factors when refrigerators and other types of modern innovations are employed to keep food fresh and pasteurize it effectively. Another point is that Roman might have seen a quick economic recovery if successfully developing other industries to compensate for their lack of food supply. Geographically, each nation is born to be in a location which could be either suitable or hostile to food production, but by focusing on their inherent strengths and exchanging their products, food supply and other types of products are readily accessible to both, and at the same time, this is conducive to heightening the specialization in their production and maximizing their output in general. Moreover, with this trend growing ever-prevalent, procedures of supervising food set up by food experts are internationalized. Entering the market of Wal-mart in America, customers are able to choose the lowest price dishes, while still feeling satisfied with their quality by dint of clear markings of out-of-date and usage attached to each item. Equally important, this tendency is a contributor to pressuring local food companies to continuously enhance their quality; otherwise, customers will turn to other markets for better ones with less cost.
All things considered, I strongly hold onto the view that more gains than pains are realized in this scenario for its cost-effective, motivational, win-win benefits for customers, producers and governments.
We all need
food
to survive. It is
thought
that with the domination of cutting-edge technology, such as airplane,
food
is accessible to everywhere while others
see
it as a
danger
,
rather
than a boon. I
totally
support the mobile trend in
food
distribution.
First of all
, opponents of this tendency argue that the spread of
food
to far-away places
is cost
-ineffective. Such fees related to gasoline, transportation delivery, staff management and
other
types
of insurance are way beyond the pocket of suppliers.
However
,
economically
, it bestows upon both producers and consumers more noticeable benefits. Due to scarcity of
food
in
some
areas,
as a result
of frozen or
extremely
scorching weather, crop failures are predictable, leading to a skyrocketing price.
Hence
, with the in-time delivery from
other
zones which are available in this
type
of needed
food
, the prices can
be curbed
and their taste is
fully
satisfied while businessmen who
truly
prioritize the demand of
customers
over others gain a huge amount of profit.
Besides
, as living standards of human escalates non-
stop
, their need for varied
food
, from eastern to western, is more urgent than ever,
especially
in times of globalization. As there goes a saying “variety is the spice of life”,
food
transported from thousands of miles away from its farm is inevitable.
The second disadvantage of this trend
is believed
to trigger the inability to control the quality of
food
and growing dependence of each nation. The past has shown that Roman, as a consequence of relying on
food
chain supply of
other
nations, ever
saw
its power going into steep decline whereas the task of far-distance distribution can hardly ensure the thorough examination between suppliers and buyers, and trigger unwanted virus damaging the
food
.
Nevertheless
, gone are the days that
food
was
easily
ruined by external factors when refrigerators and
other
types
of modern innovations
are employed
to
keep
food
fresh and pasteurize it
effectively
. Another point is that Roman might have
seen
a quick economic recovery if
successfully
developing
other
industries to compensate for their lack of
food
supply.
Geographically
, each nation
is born
to be in a location which could be either suitable or hostile to
food
production,
but
by focusing on their inherent strengths and exchanging their products,
food
supply and
other
types
of products are
readily
accessible to both, and at the same time, this is conducive to heightening the specialization in their production and maximizing their output
in general
.
Moreover
, with this trend growing ever-prevalent, procedures of supervising
food
set up by
food
experts
are internationalized
. Entering the market of
Wal-mart
in America,
customers
are able to choose the lowest price dishes, while
still
feeling satisfied with their quality by dint of
clear
markings of out-of-date and usage attached to each item.
Equally
important
, this tendency is a contributor to pressuring local
food
companies
to
continuously
enhance their quality;
otherwise
,
customers
will turn to
other
markets for better ones with less cost.
All things considered, I
strongly
hold onto the view that more gains than pains
are realized
in this scenario for its cost-effective, motivational, win-win benefits for
customers
, producers and
governments
.