Although some people argue that aged workers are more productive to an organization, other individuals think younger employees are more efficient. In my opinion, I believe it is not the age that decides whether an employee is useful or not useful, but the nature of the occupation chooses to.
On the one hand, it is commonly believed that older employees are more productive. This thought among the people is primarily because of the experience they possess. In other words, when it comes to a point where an organization has to make some critical decisions, then the role of an experienced person is very crucial. In addition to the experience, they have excellent leadership skills. This leadership skill grows when someone has more worked for so long, and this talent is essential for team coordination.
On the other hand, there are some thoughts that young workers are more competitive. The main reason for this thinking is their capability of innovative thinking. As most of the young employees directly come out of college, the way they approach some ideas is entirely different. Another point is, the freshers are equipped with an advanced skill set, which is a much-needed factor for any company to compete with others.
Finally, in my opinion, age should not be considered when it comes to talk about efficiency. At the same time, the nature of the job that dictates what type of persons ought employed. For example, Information technology is a field where one can witness a rapid change in technology day by day. So, such type of industry needs freshers whereas, in the space industry, experience matters a lot when compared to beginners.
In conclusion, while people may vary in their argument, but I think that age is not the factor to determine an employee is productive or not whereas it is the characteristic of a job that decides it.
Although
some
people
argue that aged workers are more productive to an organization, other individuals
think
younger
employees
are more efficient. In my opinion, I believe it is not the age that decides whether an
employee
is useful or not useful,
but
the nature of the occupation chooses to.
On the one hand, it is
commonly
believed that older
employees
are more productive. This
thought
among the
people
is
primarily
because
of the experience they possess.
In other words
, when it
comes
to a point where an organization
has to
make
some
critical decisions, then the role of an experienced person is
very
crucial.
In addition
to the experience, they have excellent leadership
skills
. This leadership
skill
grows when someone has more worked for
so
long, and this talent is essential for team coordination.
On the other hand
, there are
some
thoughts that young workers are more competitive. The main reason for this thinking is their capability of innovative thinking. As most of the young
employees
directly
come
out of college, the way they approach
some
ideas
is
entirely
different
. Another point is, the freshers
are equipped
with an advanced
skill
set, which is a much-needed factor for any
company
to compete with others.
Finally
, in my opinion, age should not
be considered
when it
comes
to talk about efficiency. At the same time, the nature of the job that dictates what type of persons ought employed.
For example
, Information technology is a field where one can witness a rapid
change
in technology day by day.
So
, such type of industry needs freshers whereas, in the space industry, experience matters a lot when compared to beginners.
In conclusion
, while
people
may vary in their argument,
but
I
think
that age is not the factor to determine an
employee
is productive or not whereas it is the characteristic of a job that decides it.