The issue of whether the teenagers must join the essential army service or not is certainly a controversial topic. Despite some people argued that it is pros outweighed cons. I personally disagree with that. The following examples will illustrate my point of views.
Firstly, based on the economic value, army facilities can be replaced human beings not only for the duration of function but also the expanse. In one word, it can fulfill the demands of people. For example, government can purchase the high-tech tank or automatic weapon which is controlled by machine and they can be operated properly more than a real human being. In addition, a well-trained army takes around 3 to 5 years to finish their training while the automatic weapon can be operated right after we purchased it. Moreover, citizens need to pay for a well-trained army salary until he passes away. In my opinion, I would like to pay tax for long-term used facilities rather than an army.
Secondly, I generally believe that teenagers should attend schools to acquire knowledge instead of join military. As like the topic mentioned about, most of the children in the world are without occupations and talents for employment and join military cannot provide them a well education to gain more practical skills to find a proper job. For instance, a study showed that a teenager who joined military did not acquire any general knowledge while the others who went to school obtained a numerous skill from educational center and they found a proper job afterward. It goes without saying that joining the compulsory military service for children is not beneficial for them, instead, it is a somewhat negative.
In summary, I once again reaffirm my position that I disagree necessary military activity is positive and essential for teenagers. On the contrary, I believe that it is not an appropriate way to do so based on economic value and the importance of education for youth.
The issue of whether the
teenagers
must
join
the essential
army
service or not is
certainly
a controversial topic. Despite
some
people
argued that it is pros outweighed cons. I
personally
disagree with that. The following examples will illustrate my point of views.
Firstly
, based on the economic value,
army
facilities can
be replaced
human beings not
only
for the duration of function
but
also
the expanse. In one word, it can fulfill the demands of
people
.
For example
,
government
can
purchase
the high-tech tank or automatic weapon which
is controlled
by
machine and
they can
be operated
properly
more than a real human being.
In addition
, a well-trained
army
takes around 3 to 5 years to finish their training while the automatic weapon can
be operated
right after we
purchased
it.
Moreover
, citizens need to pay for a well-trained
army
salary until he passes away. In my opinion, I would like to pay tax for long-term
used
facilities
rather
than an army.
Secondly
, I
generally
believe that
teenagers
should attend schools to acquire knowledge
instead
of
join
military. As like the topic
mentioned about,
most of the children in the world are without occupations and talents for employment and
join
military cannot provide them a well education to gain more practical
skills
to find a proper job.
For instance
, a study
showed
that a
teenager
who
joined
military did not acquire any general knowledge while the others who went to school obtained a numerous
skill
from educational
center and
they found a proper job afterward. It goes without saying that joining the compulsory military service for children is not beneficial for them,
instead
, it is a somewhat
negative
.
In summary, I once again reaffirm my position that I disagree necessary military activity is
positive
and essential for
teenagers
.
On the contrary
, I believe that it is not an appropriate way to do
so
based on economic value and the importance of education for youth.