It is stated that the recent coverages have negative influence because they are concentrating on urgent issues while ignoring the upsides. From my point of view, I totally disapprove of this statement.
Admittedly, mainly reporting the bright sides of social harmony and technology progress would boost the viewers’ confidence in the community and local government. It is true that the residents would have the sense of fulfilment and satisfaction if they are surrounded by pleasant reports. This positive attitude may also contribute to a harmonious living environment when only the bright aspects are reported by the mass media. Nevertheless, the argument above cannot be completely justified. Without the up-to-the-minute local news regarding incidents, such as serious gunfire nearby, the locals would not be warned the danger of leaving their houses, thus, saving their lives. Besides, it was the Amber alert that helped police found the abducted children and arrested the suspects immediately.
On the other hand, reports relating to social crisis and natural disasters are crucial for people to live a better life. Initially, urgent news notification can improve residents’ wellbeing. This is because when the press covers the recent damages worldwide, the general public can provide humanitarian or financial support to those in affected areas in time, thereby alleviating locals’ suffering. For example, the news broadcasted about the earthquake happened in Haiti promoted the awareness of the environmental crisis globally, so that the Haitian received immediate rescue and funding, thereby helping them getting through difficulties. Therefore, urgent news is crucial locally as well as globally.
As previously discussed, although people might feel satisfied with good news. It is more essential to cover the incidents, which will be beneficial not only to the local residents but also to the whole society.
It
is stated
that the recent coverages have
negative
influence
because
they are concentrating on urgent issues while ignoring the upsides. From my point of view, I
totally
disapprove of this statement.
Admittedly
,
mainly
reporting the bright sides of social harmony and technology progress would boost the viewers’ confidence in the community and
local
government
. It is true that the residents would have the sense of
fulfilment
and satisfaction if they
are surrounded
by pleasant reports. This
positive
attitude may
also
contribute to a harmonious living environment when
only
the bright aspects
are reported
by the mass media.
Nevertheless
, the argument above cannot be completely justified. Without the up-to-the-minute
local
news
regarding incidents, such as serious gunfire nearby, the
locals
would not
be warned
the
danger
of leaving their
houses
,
thus
, saving their
lives
.
Besides
, it was the Amber alert that
helped
police found the abducted children and arrested the suspects immediately.
On the other hand
, reports relating to social crisis and natural disasters are crucial for
people
to
live
a better life.
Initially
, urgent
news
notification can
improve
residents’
wellbeing
. This is
because
when the press covers the recent damages worldwide, the
general public
can provide humanitarian or financial support to those in
affected
areas in time, thereby alleviating
locals’
suffering.
For example
, the
news
broadcasted about the earthquake happened in Haiti promoted the awareness of the environmental crisis globally,
so
that the Haitian received immediate rescue and funding, thereby helping them
getting
through difficulties.
Therefore
, urgent
news
is crucial
locally
as well
as globally.
As previously discussed, although
people
might feel satisfied with
good
news
. It is more essential to cover the incidents, which will be beneficial not
only
to the
local
residents
but
also
to the whole society.