Correspondents, at present, tend to demonstrate the current issues and political upheavals to the public rather than positive advancements in the area, which is deleterious for the people and communities as well. I, partially, second with this viewpoint because media channels focus on both sides which bring a positive impact to individuals as well as the community.
To begin with, all TV channels, YouTube, and other social media endeavour to highlight the present problems as the downfall of a political party, murder, diplomatic thoughts of developed countries et Cetra. This is because news reporters and media channels want to become famous by any means, since they know people love to watch serious and interesting facts, for example, which politicians make a Himalayan blunder that causes a doom to the terrain. All these occurrences have a great appeal to the population of any society. The reason is that after concerning all that news, the public does not want to make mistakes in voting the accurate political party. Thus, not only the news reporter, but also individuals shows their interest in severe incidents.
On the contrary, it is unjustifiable to say that the media is indifferent to make videos about the development of a society. To illustrate, there are lots of positive progressions broadcasted in the USA in recent times, which have been telecasted in the BBC, and CNN, which consider as renowned channels. It focuses on recent discoveries, and how a developing country has developed by its industrious attitude towards work. If the public observes it, they will be able to understand which sectors, governments should focus. By doing this, the public and nations will achieve success so that correspondents elucidate in their channels all these positive aspects as well.
In conclusion, different types of news broadcasters release serious events of the community, which brings a detrimental effect on human lives, while they do not show a positive progression of the country. I, partially, agree with the statement, because they highlight on both sides to bring positive advancements of the society.
Correspondents, at present, tend to demonstrate the
current
issues and political upheavals to the
public
rather
than
positive
advancements in the area, which is deleterious for the
people
and communities
as well
. I,
partially
, second with this viewpoint
because
media
channels
focus on both sides which bring a
positive
impact to individuals
as well as
the community.
To
begin
with, all TV
channels
, YouTube, and other social
media
endeavour
to highlight the present problems as the downfall of a political party, murder, diplomatic thoughts of
developed countries
et
Cetra
. This is
because
news
reporters and
media
channels
want to become
famous
by any means, since they know
people
love
to
watch
serious and interesting facts,
for example
, which politicians
make
a Himalayan blunder that causes a doom to the terrain. All these occurrences have a great appeal to the population of any society. The reason is that after concerning all that
news
, the
public
does not want to
make
mistakes in voting the accurate political party.
Thus
, not
only
the
news
reporter,
but
also
individuals
shows
their interest in severe incidents.
On the contrary
, it is unjustifiable to say that the
media
is indifferent to
make
videos about the development of a society. To illustrate, there are lots of
positive
progressions broadcasted in the USA in recent times, which have been
telecasted
in the BBC, and CNN, which consider as renowned
channels
. It focuses on recent discoveries, and how a
developing country
has developed by its industrious attitude towards work. If the
public
observes it, they will be able to understand which sectors,
governments
should focus. By doing this, the
public
and nations will achieve success
so
that correspondents elucidate in their
channels
all these
positive
aspects
as well
.
In conclusion
,
different
types of
news
broadcasters release serious
events
of the community, which brings a detrimental effect on human
lives
, while they do not
show
a
positive
progression of the country. I,
partially
,
agree
with the statement,
because
they highlight on both sides to bring
positive
advancements of the society.