A few people consider that the preservation of nature is the authority responsibility, but others contradicted that and it is a duty of the people. In my opinion, protecting the climate is should be a priority for both the citizens and the government.
Firstly, the ministry accountable for the citizens, if they make an advertisement in all media means they will be a huge knowledge for the extended importance of the climate among all standards of people; the poor and the rich. As a result, the ancestors have the awareness of how the habitat is significant. Although there are some people in contrast with nature it is not this extend of crucial. For example, the US in 1985 the government announced that they made a rough punishment for those part who didn't follow the rule of conserving the environment.
Secondly, the ancestors can rescue the landscape and advise their neighborhood about how dangerous and hideous it will be if there is not sufficient attention. Furthermore, they can support a suitable behaviour for the world that they avoid throwaway the material after they used it and try to recycle it. Therefore, they get to benefit from ancient goods. For instance, China in 1983 has to establish a factory for recycling aged products. Consequently, the citizens put an old output in an appropriate area.
In conclusion, not the only authority that making low for conserving the surrounding area, but also it is the community trust. However, the climate is essential. I do agree, that the liability of the statue is the shoulder for both the society and the government.
A few
people
consider that the preservation of nature is the authority responsibility,
but
others contradicted that and it is a duty of the
people
. In my opinion, protecting the climate
is
should be a priority for both the citizens and the
government
.
Firstly
, the ministry accountable for the citizens, if they
make
an advertisement in all media means they will be
a huge knowledge
for the extended importance of the climate among all standards of
people
; the poor and the rich.
As a result
, the ancestors have the awareness of how the habitat is significant.
Although
there are
some
people
in contrast
with nature it is not
this extend
of crucial.
For example
, the US in 1985 the
government
announced that they made a rough punishment for those part who didn't follow the
rule
of conserving the environment.
Secondly
, the ancestors can rescue the landscape and advise their neighborhood about how
dangerous
and hideous it will be if there is not sufficient attention.
Furthermore
, they can support a suitable
behaviour
for the world that they avoid throwaway the material after they
used
it and try to recycle it.
Therefore
, they
get
to benefit from ancient
goods
.
For instance
, China in 1983
has to
establish a factory for recycling aged products.
Consequently
, the citizens put an
old
output in an appropriate area.
In conclusion
, not the
only
authority that making low for conserving the surrounding area,
but
also
it is the community trust.
However
, the climate is essential. I do
agree
, that the liability of the
statue
is the shoulder for both the society and the
government
.