Some argue that instead of paying for treatment of ill people, the government should try to stop these ailments from occurring on the first place. I disagree with such claims because redirecting fund away from medical care and ill patients can present high risk for the society in short term.
To begin with, there is no doubt that preventive measures in public health include such important steps as vaccination and promotion of healthy lifestyle. Both can help all community members to stay healthy for longer, and therefore could reduce pressure on the hospitals. These measures demand for significant financing from the government budget. However, the benefits of preventive measures are only seen in the long term perspective and do not eliminate the illnesses of people who already require medical care today.
On the other hand, high quality medical care available for all population is one of the most important factors in increasing life expectancy in the country. Many people in present time are already ill and require immediate treatments. If the government lowers its funding for medical care, the hospitals will be plunged in chaos while doctors will struggle to treat people who require urgent help. In such situation, untreated illnesses can lead to deaths, which is unacceptable. Hence, the government must make sure it provides necessary medical treatments to people in need.
In conclusion, I recognize the significance of preventing illnesses as a long term policy of a state. However, it is dangerous to promote it at an expense of existing funding dedicated to treating already existing conditions. If done incorrectly, the measure can lead to serious consequences, including death of hospital patients. All things considered, I disagree that such redistribution policy should be implemented.
Some
argue that
instead
of paying for treatment of ill
people
, the
government
should try to
stop
these ailments from occurring on the
first
place. I disagree with such claims
because
redirecting fund away from
medical
care
and ill patients can present high
risk
for the society in short term.
To
begin
with, there is no doubt that preventive
measures
in public health include such
important
steps as vaccination and promotion of healthy lifestyle. Both can
help
all community members to stay healthy for longer, and
therefore
could
reduce
pressure on the hospitals. These
measures
demand for significant financing from the
government
budget.
However
, the benefits of preventive
measures
are
only
seen
in the long term perspective and do not eliminate the illnesses of
people
who already require
medical
care
today
.
On the other hand
, high quality
medical
care
available for all population is one of the most
important
factors in increasing life expectancy in the country.
Many
people
in present time are already ill and require immediate treatments. If the
government
lowers its funding for
medical
care
, the hospitals will
be plunged
in chaos while doctors will struggle to treat
people
who require urgent
help
. In such situation, untreated illnesses can lead to deaths, which is unacceptable.
Hence
, the
government
must
make
sure it provides necessary
medical
treatments to
people
in need.
In conclusion
, I recognize the significance of preventing illnesses as a long term policy of a state.
However
, it is
dangerous
to promote it at an expense of existing funding dedicated to treating already existing conditions. If done
incorrectly
, the
measure
can lead to serious consequences, including death of hospital patients. All things considered, I disagree that such redistribution policy should
be implemented
.