Governments in some countries spend large amounts of money on space exploration
programmes. I completely agree with the idea that these are a waste of money, and that the funds should be allocated to public services.
There are several reasons why space programmes should be abandoned. Firstly, it is
extremely expensive to train scientists and other staff involved with space missions, and facilities and equipment also come at a huge cost to the government. Secondly, these programmes do not benefit normal people in our daily lives; they are simply vanity projects for politicians. Finally, many missions to space fail completely, and the smallest technological error can cost astronauts their lives. The Challenger space shuttle disaster showed us that space travel is extremely dangerous, and in my opinion it is not worth the risk.
I believe that the money from space programmes should go to vital public services instead. It is much cheaper to train doctors, teachers, police and other public service workers than it is to train astronauts or the scientists and engineers who work on space exploration projects. Furthermore, public servants do jobs that have a positive impact on every member of society. For example, we all use schools, hospitals and roads, and we all need the security that the police provide. If governments reallocated the money spent on space travel and research, many thousands of people could be lifted out of poverty or given a better quality of life.
In conclusion, my view is that governments should spend money on services that benefit all members of society, and it is wrong to waste resources on projects that do not improve our everyday lives.
Governments
in
some
countries spend large amounts of
money
on
space
exploration
programmes
. I completely
agree
with the
idea
that these are a waste of
money
, and that the funds should
be allocated
to
public
services.
There are several reasons why
space
programmes
should
be abandoned
.
Firstly
, it is
extremely
expensive to train scientists and other staff involved with
space
missions, and facilities and equipment
also
come
at a huge cost to the
government
.
Secondly
, these
programmes
do not benefit normal
people
in our daily
lives
; they are
simply
vanity projects for politicians.
Finally
,
many
missions to
space
fail completely, and the smallest technological error can cost astronauts their
lives
. The Challenger
space
shuttle disaster
showed
us that
space
travel is
extremely
dangerous
, and in my opinion it is not worth the
risk
.
I believe that the
money
from
space
programmes
should go to vital
public
services
instead
. It is much cheaper to train doctors, teachers, police and other
public
service workers than it is to train astronauts or the scientists and engineers who work on
space
exploration projects.
Furthermore
,
public
servants do jobs that have a
positive
impact on every member of society.
For example
, we all
use
schools, hospitals and roads, and we all need the security that the police provide. If
governments
reallocated the
money
spent on
space
travel and research,
many
thousands of
people
could
be lifted
out of poverty or
given
a better quality of life.
In conclusion
, my view is that
governments
should spend
money
on services that benefit all members of society, and it is
wrong
to waste resources on projects that do not
improve
our everyday
lives
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
22Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes