In today's developing world, the number of people using text messaging on their mobile phones is significantly increasing. It is inarguable that text messaging has altered the world of communication. However, some are of the opinion that the use of text messaging has a bad impact on the standards of written English. Apropos of the statement, I am in consummate discord with it.
It is irrefutable that with the invention of text messaging, human's lives have also been made easier. Text messaging was invented with the intention of facilitating communication, and hence the prevalent use of acronyms to make text messages shorter and more convenient. Also, long formal text messages do not go in accordance with the function of text messaging, which is to make communication easier.
Furthermore, it is unreasonable to make an assumption that someone is unable to construct correct grammatical sentences just because the said person has a tendency to use acronyms. People need to understand that text messaging is not a means of learning English and the inability to form a correct sentence is more of a problem with an English teacher than with text messaging. It is not unusual that someone with a nice grammatical accuracy writes conventional SMS and it does not decrease the level of proficiency s/he already has. On the other hand, if someone makes a habit of writing such messages at the beginning level, especially non-native English speakers, might grow up the tendency of making mistakes in the formal writing.
To sum up, the falling standards in written English does not have the slightest correlation with text messaging. Text messaging is invented to make communication easier and it is not a means of learning English, and therefore it is hardly to blame for people's incapability to construct correct sentences.
In
today
's developing world, the number of
people
using
text
messaging on their mobile phones is
significantly
increasing. It is inarguable that
text
messaging has altered the world of
communication
.
However
,
some
are of the opinion that the
use
of
text
messaging has a
bad
impact on the standards of written English. Apropos of the statement, I am in consummate discord with it.
It is irrefutable that with the invention of
text
messaging, human's
lives
have
also
been made
easier.
Text
messaging
was invented
with the intention of facilitating
communication
, and
hence
the prevalent
use
of acronyms to
make
text
messages shorter and more convenient.
Also
, long formal
text
messages do not go in accordance with the function of
text
messaging, which is to
make
communication
easier.
Furthermore
, it is unreasonable to
make
an assumption that someone is unable to construct correct grammatical sentences
just
because
the said person has a tendency to
use
acronyms.
People
need to understand that
text
messaging is not a means of learning English and the inability to form a correct sentence is more of a problem with an English teacher than with
text
messaging. It is not unusual that someone with a nice grammatical accuracy writes conventional SMS and it does not decrease the level of proficiency s/he already has.
On the other hand
, if someone
makes
a habit of writing such messages at the beginning level,
especially
non-native English speakers, might grow up the tendency of making mistakes in the formal writing.
To sum up, the falling standards in written English does not have the slightest correlation with
text
messaging.
Text
messaging
is invented
to
make
communication
easier and it is not a means of learning English, and
therefore
it is hardly to blame for
people
's incapability to construct correct sentences.