Some nations are grappling with the booming in criminality. There are a variety of solutions to solve such puzzle, but many believe that the most efficient way is increasing the number of police officers on the street. Although such features may prove damaging in crime rates with obvious reasons, I strongly believe that tackling the root causes is the optimal way to reduce the crime proportion.
To begin with, it is undeniable the fact that increasing the number of policemen can act as a deterrent for criminals who have any purposes to commit a crime. Take USA in the early 90s under Kenedy presidents is an example, America at this time was deemed as a haven for offenders so that one of many effective way to tackle this issue of this president was increasing police presences on streets that led to a reciprocal decline in crime figures.
However, such above-mentioned features just work well if governments take into account of bearing with the root causes. In fact, the percentage of crime is related directly to poverty and indirectly to education, you can see in many thriving countries where there are modern educational systems, helping youngsters to upgrade their academic performance. For example, in Japan renowned with the most logical educational systems, students in this country graduated from high schools or universities were educated to gain essential knowledge and skills which aligned well with what the job markets were looking for. As the result, every resident of Japan had their own job so that they can have sufficient money to afford for a high standard life and had no incentive to commit any crimes.
To sum up, while increasing the number of police officers is a valid standpoint, it is not feasible to root out crime. Instead of employing more cops, the governments should concentrate on education and the economy that can lead to a correspondingly drop in crime rates.
Some
nations are grappling with the booming in criminality. There are a variety of solutions to solve such puzzle,
but
many
believe that the most efficient way is
increasing
the number of police officers on the street. Although such features may prove damaging in
crime
rates with obvious reasons, I
strongly
believe that tackling the root causes is the optimal way to
reduce
the
crime
proportion.
To
begin
with, it is undeniable the fact that
increasing
the number of policemen can act as a deterrent for criminals who have any purposes to commit a
crime
. Take USA in the early 90s under
Kenedy
presidents is an example, America at this time
was deemed
as a haven for offenders
so
that one of
many
effective way to tackle this issue of this president was
increasing
police presences on streets that led to a reciprocal decline in
crime
figures.
However
, such above-mentioned features
just
work well if
governments
take into account of bearing with the root causes. In fact, the percentage of
crime
is related
directly
to poverty and
indirectly
to education, you can
see
in
many
thriving countries where there are modern educational systems, helping youngsters to upgrade their academic performance.
For example
, in Japan renowned with the most logical educational systems, students in this country graduated from high schools or universities
were educated
to gain essential knowledge and
skills
which aligned well with what the job markets were looking for. As the result, every resident of Japan had their
own
job
so
that they can have sufficient money to afford for a high standard life and had no incentive to commit any crimes.
To sum up, while
increasing
the number of police officers is a valid standpoint, it is not feasible to root out
crime
.
Instead
of employing more cops, the
governments
should concentrate on education and the economy that can lead to a
correspondingly drop
in
crime
rates.