There is a claim that invest state budget on arts, music and theaters is a waste of money, thus state budget should use for public service. Even though I agree that public service is more crucial but government should set a side budget for development of art and culture sector.
Art and culture sector might not always help solving major issue for societies especially in the level of national economic. So, the state budget should be used for upgrading public service such as healthcare, education or infrastructure. An improved public service can improve overall quality of life of locals and it is vitally important for their well-being. For instance, locals can live without going to theater for recreation but absence of health care service will create serious problem for the citizens. This is a reason why the governments should consider public service investment as a priority sector.
On the other hand, investing in arts, music and theaters is not a waste of money, because they are part of culture and society which carries from generation to generation. Arts are not always known as paintings or crafts but arts can represent in old building architectures and poems. Sometimes those ancient arts and cultures can also generate money for local or for society. For example, a public museum can display valuable sculptures or can show historical documentary films for young generation to learn about history, at the same time it can generate money from cultural tourism. This type of tourism attracts tourists who travel to learn about different cultures and histories.
In conclusion, government should consider public service as a main investment priory and spends major portion of the funds to upgrade public service and follow by arts, music and theaters. Because both of them play important roles in different aspects.
There is a claim that invest state
budget
on
arts
, music and theaters is a waste of
money
,
thus
state
budget
should
use
for
public
service
.
Even though
I
agree
that
public
service
is more crucial
but
government
should set a side
budget
for development of
art
and
culture
sector.
Art and
culture
sector might not always
help
solving
major issue for societies
especially
in the level of national economic.
So
, the state
budget
should be
used
for upgrading
public
service
such as healthcare, education or infrastructure. An
improved
public
service
can
improve
overall
quality of life of locals and it is
vitally
important
for their well-being.
For instance
, locals can
live
without going to
theater
for recreation
but
absence of health care
service
will create serious problem for the citizens. This is a reason why the
governments
should consider
public
service
investment as a priority sector.
On the other hand
, investing in
arts
, music and theaters is not a waste of
money
,
because
they are part of
culture
and society which carries from generation to generation.
Arts
are not always known as paintings or crafts
but
arts
can represent in
old
building architectures and poems.
Sometimes
those ancient
arts
and
cultures
can
also
generate
money
for local or for society.
For example
, a
public
museum can display valuable sculptures or can
show
historical documentary films for young generation to learn about history, at the same time it can generate
money
from cultural tourism. This type of tourism attracts tourists who travel to learn about
different
cultures
and histories.
In conclusion
,
government
should consider
public
service
as a main investment priory and spends major portion of the funds to upgrade
public
service
and follow by
arts
, music and theaters.
Because
both of them play
important
roles in
different
aspects.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
37Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes