The overwhelming budget for arts, museums and galleries is often criticised by a group of people and they advocate the need of this money on more pressing issues like hunger, poor health care, and terrorism. They also opine that people who have enthusiasm for such arts should bear the expenses. I believe that arts and museums are part of the enlightened world and they reflect the identity of a country. Hence the spending by the government in arts is quite logical.
To begin with, museums preserve the history and they have great educational values. They attract a huge number of foreign visitors and bring foreign currency for a country. For instance, the British Museum in London alone attracts more than 6. 8 million visitors annually and this brings a lot of foreigners in London as well. Furthermore, a large number of art galleries and theatres are the reason people find visiting the UK a unique experience. They would not have been here if the UK did not have these attractions. On top of that, visual arts, performing arts and other art forms reflect the unique heritage and culture the United Kingdom has. They convey our strength, tell our history and preserve our culture.
Human minds crave for arts and without arts, science would become too technical to the mass people to enjoy. For instance, the incredible powers of computers do not only solve complex mathematical equations, but also create animations, graphics and other forms of arts for people to enjoy.
In summary, people need arts as much as they need science. Only food cannot ensure better living as we need to get engages in creative activities and yield artworks. In my opinion, the works of Thomas Hudson are no less important than the works of any scientists. So the government's funding for different forms of arts and museums is totally justified.
The overwhelming budget for
arts
,
museums
and galleries is
often
criticised
by a group of
people and
they advocate the
need
of this money on more pressing issues like hunger, poor health care, and terrorism. They
also
opine that
people
who have enthusiasm for such arts
should bear the expenses. I believe that
arts
and
museums
are part of the enlightened
world and
they reflect the identity of a country.
Hence
the spending by the
government
in
arts
is quite logical.
To
begin
with,
museums
preserve the
history and
they have great educational values. They attract a huge number of foreign visitors and bring foreign currency for a country.
For instance
, the British
Museum
in London alone attracts more than 6. 8 million visitors
annually
and this brings
a lot of
foreigners in London
as well
.
Furthermore
,
a large number of
art
galleries and
theatres
are the reason
people
find visiting the UK a unique experience. They would
not have been here if the UK did not have these attractions.
On top of that
, visual
arts
, performing
arts
and other
art
forms reflect the unique heritage and culture the United Kingdom has. They convey our strength,
tell
our history and preserve our culture.
Human minds crave for
arts
and without
arts
, science would become too technical to the mass
people
to enjoy.
For instance
, the incredible powers of computers do not
only
solve complex mathematical equations,
but
also
create animations, graphics and other forms of
arts
for
people
to enjoy.
In summary,
people
need
arts
as much as they
need
science.
Only
food cannot ensure better living as we
need
to
get
engages in creative activities and yield artworks. In my opinion, the works of Thomas Hudson are no less
important
than the works of any scientists.
So
the
government
's funding for
different
forms of
arts
and
museums
is
totally
justified.