There is no doubt that sports and arts play a very crucial role in development of a nation. While it is opine that, council authorities should motivate school children to learn sports and art activities, however they should not encourage the professional aspect of these skills. I do not completely agree with either of these perspectives and will support my explanation with relevant examples.
On the one hand, students should be encouraged to participate in these skills for their growth and development. This is because, learners should have autonomy to choose, which help them to acknowledge new dimensions of their life. For example, according to a report published by the UK newspaper in 2011, highlighted the neuro- cognitive development of these students who were involved in skills like sports or arts (music, painting, dancing). In contrast, a strict supervision should be done on children so that they do not over indulge and loose concentration from academics. As a result, they would perform mediocrely in both aspects of life.
On the other hand, I believe Buroaucrates should motivate the professional aspect of these skills. The reason is that, it would create a sense of patriotism as well as generate revenue, which would help in boosting economy of a country. For instance, in my own experience, I am a professional tennis player and have received tremendous accolades and financial benefits due to this. As a result, I donate this amount for the welfare of my state. However, the atheletes should not exploit this gift for their personal benefits.
Therefore, I believe whether these skills are encouraged at school or professional level, personality and environmental factors play an important role in choosing how to utilize these gifts.
In conclusion, while it is beneficial to encourage school learners to learn sports and arts, I believe it should also be promoted professionally to lead them to a path of success.
There is no doubt that
sports
and
arts
play a
very
crucial role in development of a nation. While it is
opine
that, council authorities should motivate school children to learn
sports
and
art
activities,
however
they should not encourage the
professional
aspect of these
skills
. I do not completely
agree
with either of these perspectives and will support my explanation with relevant examples.
On the one hand, students should
be encouraged
to participate in these
skills
for their growth and development. This is
because
, learners should have autonomy to choose, which
help
them to acknowledge new dimensions of their life.
For example
, according to a report published by the UK newspaper in 2011, highlighted the
neuro
- cognitive development of these students who
were involved
in
skills
like
sports
or
arts
(music, painting, dancing).
In contrast
, a strict supervision should
be done
on children
so
that they do not over indulge and loose concentration from academics.
As a result
, they would perform
mediocrely
in both aspects of life.
On the other hand
, I believe
Buroaucrates
should motivate the
professional
aspect of these
skills
. The reason is that, it would create a sense of patriotism
as well
as generate revenue, which would
help
in boosting economy of a country.
For instance
, in my
own
experience, I am a
professional
tennis player and have received tremendous accolades and financial benefits due to this.
As a result
, I donate this amount for the welfare of my state.
However
, the
atheletes
should not exploit this gift for their personal benefits.
Therefore
, I believe whether these
skills
are encouraged
at school or
professional
level, personality and environmental factors play an
important
role in choosing how to utilize these gifts.
In conclusion
, while it is beneficial to encourage school learners to learn
sports
and
arts
, I believe it should
also
be promoted
professionally
to lead them to a path of success.