Nobody can deny that there are certain professionals like nurses, doctors and teachers who are essential to the fabric of society, and who should therefore be rewarded accordingly. However, this is seldom the case. When we look at the checks and fees commanded by certain film stars and actresses and people who run large companies, this does not seem fair.
First of all, not all film stars earn huge sums of cash. In fact, at any one time in the UK, for instance, roughly 80 percent of actors are out of work and on top of that, the number who are paid so-called ‘telephone number fees’ is even smaller. One must also remember that the future of many tv actors is very short and that thus the money they earn has to be spread over many years. The same applies to company bosses.
Stating a set of criteria as to how much people should be paid is not easy. The idea of performance-related pay is very much in vogue at the moment. Rewarding people, according to qualifications has long been used as a yardstick for paying people, but it is not a consistently good measure. Nevertheless, there are many cases where a younger person can perform a task better than someone with lots of experience.
Whatever criteria are used to evaluate salaries, an on-going cycle will develop. This will create pressure in other areas. This considered, generally I feel that certain key professionals should have their liquidation assessed by independent review bodies on an on-going basis so that they do not fall behind.
Nobody can deny that there are certain professionals like nurses, doctors and teachers
who
are essential to the fabric of society, and
who
should
therefore
be rewarded
accordingly
.
However
, this is seldom the case. When we look at the
checks
and fees commanded by certain film stars and actresses and
people
who
run large
companies
, this does not seem
fair
.
First of all
, not all film stars earn huge sums of cash. In fact, at any one time in the UK,
for instance
, roughly 80 percent of actors are out of work and
on top of that
, the number
who
are paid
so
-called ‘telephone number fees’ is even smaller. One
must
also
remember that the future of
many
tv
actors is
very
short and that
thus
the money they earn
has to
be spread
over
many
years. The same
applies to
company
bosses.
Stating a set of criteria as to how much
people
should
be paid
is not easy. The
idea
of performance-related pay is
very
much in vogue at the moment. Rewarding
people
, according to qualifications has long been
used
as a yardstick for paying
people
,
but
it is not a
consistently
good
measure.
Nevertheless
, there are
many
cases where a younger person can perform a task better than someone with lots of experience.
Whatever criteria are
used
to evaluate salaries, an
on-going
cycle will develop. This will create pressure in other areas. This considered,
generally
I feel that certain key professionals should have their liquidation assessed by independent review bodies on an
on-going
basis
so
that they do not fall behind.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes