Nowadays one of the significant issues of the society is a deficiency of accommodation and related social implications. Some people consider that only authorities can tackle the issue. I somehow agree with this opinion, meanwhile I believe that ordinary citizens may improve the situation in the case of combining their efforts.
First, lack of housing stock has obviously negative impact on a society and standards of living. Homeless population due to lack of decent shelter tend to have more health associated problems. In addition, stray people are caught up in a vicious circle, when it is difficult for them to find well-paid jobs because of their circumstances and there is not a chance to purchase or rent a place suitable for residence.
Thus, the best way to resolve the issue is determined actions of the government, such as allocating sufficient funds for construction of accommodation for those who is below the line of poverty and does not have own property to live in. In addition, authorities may provide alleviation of taxes for those businesses who build social dwellings for citizens.
However, the public can address the problem as well by collecting money for already existed shelters or even helping to build houses for stray people. For instance, I discovered a project of one American couple who raise funds online and build tidy wooden houses for homeless people. Interestingly, that the cost of this house is around one thousand dollars, quite affordable for the public.
In conclusion, I partly agree that the government should be responsible for handling scarcity of residential buildings because it has powerful financial instruments for tackling it. Meanwhile, the society can contribute in alleviating the burden of housing shortage.
Nowadays one of the significant issues of the society is a deficiency of accommodation and related social implications.
Some
people
consider that
only
authorities can tackle the issue. I somehow
agree
with this opinion, meanwhile I believe that ordinary citizens may
improve
the situation in the case of combining their efforts.
First
, lack of housing stock has
obviously
negative
impact on a society and standards of living. Homeless population due to lack of decent shelter tend to have more health associated problems.
In addition
, stray
people
are caught
up in a vicious circle, when it is difficult for them to find well-paid jobs
because
of their circumstances and there is not a chance to
purchase
or rent a place suitable for residence.
Thus
, the best way to resolve the issue
is determined
actions of the
government
, such as allocating sufficient funds for construction of accommodation for those who is below the line of poverty and does not have
own
property to
live
in.
In addition
, authorities may provide alleviation of taxes for those businesses who build social dwellings for citizens.
However
, the public can address the problem
as well
by collecting money for already existed shelters or even helping to build
houses
for stray
people
.
For instance
, I discovered a project of one American couple who raise funds online and build tidy wooden
houses
for homeless
people
.
Interestingly
, that the cost of this
house
is around one thousand dollars, quite affordable for the public.
In conclusion
, I partly
agree
that the
government
should be responsible for handling scarcity of residential buildings
because
it has powerful financial instruments for tackling it. Meanwhile, the society can contribute in alleviating the burden of housing shortage.