Nowadays, detailed descriptions of crimes could be seen on the media frequently. It is a highly debatable issue whether media should broadcast smallest details of a crime to the masses or not. Personally, I think that media should be very judicious in selecting what to report and how much to report.
Firstly, the details of crimes make a misleading statement to the children and adolescents who are curious about the process of committing crimes, and are likely to copy the criminal actions blindly. Thus, the rate of juvenile delinquency may sharply increase due to the influence of misbehavior. Furthermore, the detailed description does not show enough respects to the victims and their family. For example, if any murder or robbery has taken place in someone’s house, then if it is shown in detail on TV, the whole privacy of those people is lost. Finally, some details of crimes are too cruel and make people feel terrified about their surroundings, some might even develop a distrust towards governments, which would impair social security and stability.
On the other hand, the opponents claim that as many details as possible should be published point out the demand for such information of the public and the freedom of information. Many members of the public believe that the more information they have, the better they can protect themselves from criminals. Those who believe in the maximum possible freedom of information think that it is the people’s right to be told as much as possible. However, the press should play a key role as the justicial direction of public opinion, and should not overreport just because of a well-looking audience rating.
In conclusion, I think that the media have an obligation to show a right direction for the public. It should report news objective and balance, rather than highlight the details of the crime. 
Nowadays, detailed descriptions of  
crimes
 could be  
seen
 on the  
media
  frequently
. It is a  
highly
 debatable issue whether  
media
 should broadcast  
smallest
  details
 of a  
crime
 to the masses or not.  
Personally
, I  
think
 that  
media
 should be  
very
 judicious in selecting what to report and how much to report. 
Firstly
, the  
details
 of  
crimes
  make
 a misleading statement to the children and adolescents who are curious about the process of committing  
crimes
, and are likely to copy the criminal actions  
blindly
.  
Thus
, the rate of juvenile delinquency may  
sharply
 increase due to the influence of misbehavior.  
Furthermore
, the detailed description does not  
show
  enough
 respects to the victims and their family.  
For example
, if any murder or robbery has taken place in someone’s  
house
, then if it  
is shown
 in  
detail
 on TV, the whole privacy of those  
people
  is lost
.  
Finally
,  
some
  details
 of  
crimes
 are too cruel and  
make
  people
 feel terrified about their surroundings,  
some
 might even develop a distrust towards  
governments
, which would impair social security and stability. 
On the other hand
, the opponents claim that as  
many
  details
 as possible should  
be published
 point out the demand for such  
information
 of the  
public
 and the freedom of  
information
.  
Many
 members of the  
public
 believe that the more  
information
 they have, the better they can protect themselves from criminals. Those who believe in the maximum possible freedom of  
information
  think
 that it is the  
people
’s right to be  
told
 as much as possible.  
However
, the press should play a key role as the  
justicial
 direction of  
public
 opinion, and should not  
overreport
  just
  because
 of a well-looking audience rating. 
In conclusion
, I  
think
 that the  
media
 have an obligation to  
show
 a right direction for the  
public
. It should report news objective and balance,  
rather
 than highlight the  
details
 of the  
crime
.