Traffic jams have become an increasingly acute problem for certain geographical areas. Some people claim that the most effective method to combat the problem is to encourage individuals to move to cities from suburbs and countrysides. This essay will argue reasons as to why urbanization is not the best way to go about, even though there are some benefits to it.
Settling down in cities of residents of countrysides will significantly decrease the number of personal transport on the roads. That is because people who had to commute big distances in order to get to their workplaces will no longer have to do that. Living in a big city gives the opportunity to find a job of interest nearby person’s home. This makes taking a short walk to work rather than using transport possible, which leads to a smaller number of drivers on highways. This instance has bolstered existing opinion that moving to cities will solve the problem of transportation and traffic.
Despite possible benefits associated with urbanization, the idea that this is the best way to solve challenges related to traffic is completely preposterous. Resettlement of people could lead to increased amounts of citizens, which, in turn, anyway will increase traffic on the roads. In addition, the number of people who do not own personal transport might grow and the government will have to take care of this as well. Overall, the idea that mass relocation to urban areas will solve transportation and traffic problems is ill-informed and could potentially lead to a far worse outcome.
This essay argued that urbanization is not the best way to solve the problem. In my opinion, significant drawbacks of mass moving from rural to urban areas do not allow this method to be called the best.
Traffic
jams have become an
increasingly
acute
problem
for certain geographical areas.
Some
people
claim that the most effective method to combat the
problem
is to encourage individuals to
move
to
cities
from suburbs and countrysides. This essay will argue reasons as to why urbanization is not the
best
way to go about,
even though
there are
some
benefits to it.
Settling down in
cities
of residents of countrysides will
significantly
decrease the number of personal transport on the roads.
That is
because
people
who had to commute
big
distances in order to
get
to their workplaces will no longer
have to
do that. Living in a
big
city gives the opportunity to find a job of interest nearby person’s home. This
makes
taking a short walk to work
rather
than using transport possible, which leads to a smaller number of drivers on highways. This instance has bolstered existing opinion that moving to
cities
will
solve
the
problem
of transportation and traffic.
Despite possible benefits associated with urbanization, the
idea
that this is the
best
way to
solve
challenges related to
traffic
is completely preposterous. Resettlement of
people
could lead to increased amounts of citizens, which, in turn, anyway will increase
traffic
on the roads.
In addition
, the number of
people
who do not
own
personal transport might grow and the
government
will
have to
take care of this
as well
.
Overall
, the
idea
that mass relocation to urban areas will
solve
transportation and
traffic
problems
is ill-informed and could
potentially
lead to a far worse outcome.
This essay argued that urbanization is not the
best
way to
solve
the
problem
. In my opinion, significant drawbacks of mass moving from rural to urban areas do not
allow
this method to
be called
the
best
.