Employees are often enquired of their private details, including their extracurricular activities and their marital status. Some consider this information unnecessary, while others take no offense to it. In my opinion, a company should only be entitled to information about the job requirement.
On one hand, some professionals have no objection with regard to providing their personal information for a mandatory background check. It is a procedure essentially carried out to avoid frauds and malpractices of any kind. Personal data is collected to redeem private benefits, for example, a company may sponsor a holiday for an efficient performer and his family. Verification of personal information to make sure their authenticity enables an organization to choose the most suitable candidates.
On the other hand, a majority of the working class consider submitting queries about themselves, as privacy is intruded. Companies must also sign a privacy contract to safeguard their employees from any threat. They opine that such information creates a biased attitude among an organization. This is unhealthy for a good work environment. For instance, a colleague could be disrespectful towards his subordinate on knowing his unfortunate family background.
In my view, employees must coöperate with their work authority and follow rules that ensure their safety and offer other employee benefits. I believe there is a distinction between personal and professional life. Opportunities are created if the organization is aware of the capabilities and talents its workforce possesses. A good example could be of organizations, annually felicitated the extraordinary performers and create a platform for others to exhibit their hobbies.
A successful organization will always focus on the pertinent skill required to function smoothly and follow a good work ethic.
Employees
are
often
enquired
of their private
details
, including their extracurricular activities and their marital status.
Some
consider this
information
unnecessary, while others take no offense to it. In my opinion, a
company
should
only
be entitled
to
information
about the job requirement.
On one hand,
some
professionals have no objection with regard to providing their
personal
information
for a mandatory background
check
. It is a procedure
essentially
carried out to avoid frauds and malpractices of any kind.
Personal
data
is collected
to redeem private benefits,
for example
, a
company
may sponsor a holiday for an efficient performer and his family. Verification of
personal
information
to
make
sure their authenticity enables an
organization
to choose the most suitable candidates.
On the
other
hand, a majority of the working
class
consider submitting queries about themselves, as privacy
is intruded
.
Companies
must
also
sign
a privacy contract to safeguard their
employees
from any threat. They opine that such
information
creates a biased attitude among an
organization
. This is unhealthy for a
good
work environment.
For instance
, a colleague could be disrespectful towards his subordinate on knowing his unfortunate family background.
In my view,
employees
must
coöperate
with their work authority and follow
rules
that ensure their safety and offer
other
employee
benefits. I believe there is a distinction between
personal
and professional life. Opportunities
are created
if the
organization
is aware of the capabilities and talents its workforce possesses. A
good
example could be of
organizations
,
annually
felicitated the extraordinary performers and create a platform for others to exhibit their hobbies.
A successful
organization
will always focus on the pertinent
skill
required to function
smoothly
and follow a
good
work ethic.