It is often argued that requiring an applicant to provide additional personal information such as hobbies or marital status is beneficial for the employer; however, many people disagree with this view and claim that this information is useless and holds no value. This essay will elaborate on both points of view and present my opinion.
On the one hand, there are grounds to believe that employers need more than just the professional information to better assess their prospective candidates. With increasing emphasis on collaborative work culture and need for every employee to fit into the team dynamics, collecting extracurricular and personal information will help the employer select the right candidates and match them with right opportunities. For instance, several applicants may be deemed fit for a marketing position based on their qualification and work history. Those among them having special interests in traveling and meeting people are certainly more suited for this position and an employer needs to ask about their hobbies to figure this out.
Nonetheless, many of those who disagree with this argument doubt the authenticity of such information provided in the job applications. They believe that the job applicants tend to make up some hobbies and interests just to impress the employers. According to a survey conducted by a student group from London School of Economics, only 40% of the respondents of a survey gave genuine answers when asked about their extracurricular interests.
In conclusion, while some are still doubtful of the veracity / truthfulness of information provided by candidates for a job position, it is believed that collecting this information greatly helps an employer in better decision making. In my opinion, the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages, and hence, the more information an employer gathers about an applicant, the better the decision making process will be.
It is
often
argued that requiring an
applicant
to provide additional personal
information
such as hobbies or marital status is beneficial for the
employer
;
however
,
many
people
disagree with this view and claim that this
information
is useless and holds no value. This essay will elaborate on both points of view and present my opinion.
On the one hand, there are grounds to believe that
employers
need more than
just
the professional
information
to better assess their prospective candidates. With increasing emphasis on collaborative work culture and need for every employee to fit into the team dynamics, collecting extracurricular and personal
information
will
help
the
employer
select the right candidates and match them with right opportunities.
For instance
, several
applicants
may
be deemed
fit for a marketing position based on their qualification and work history. Those among them having special interests in traveling and meeting
people
are
certainly
more suited for this position and an
employer
needs to ask about their hobbies to figure this out.
Nonetheless,
many
of those who disagree with this argument doubt the authenticity of such
information
provided in the job applications. They believe that the job
applicants
tend to
make
up
some
hobbies and interests
just
to impress the
employers
. According to a survey conducted by a student group from London School of Economics,
only
40% of the respondents of a survey gave genuine answers when asked about their extracurricular interests.
In conclusion
, while
some
are
still
doubtful of the veracity / truthfulness of
information
provided by candidates for a job position, it
is believed
that collecting this
information
greatly
helps
an
employer
in better
decision making
. In my opinion, the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages, and
hence
, the more
information
an
employer
gathers about an
applicant
, the better the
decision making
process will be.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
19Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes